I have many issues going back to 12-07 On Mon, Feb 9, 2015 at 5:06 PM, Kenneth Irving <kenneth.irving@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > That can be of great help. How should we proceed? Any suggestions? > > 2015-02-09 19:50 GMT-02:00 <shawn.mchatten@xxxxxxxxxxx>: > > I kept all 6800 messages from when I joined back on Feb 12, 2009. > Coincidence or what. I've culled the 700 messages or so from the last year > and a half, from Jan 1, 2012 to mid June 2013 when the list shut down. There > were around 100 contributors in those 700 messages that I can drag the email > addresses out of if that would help. It will only be those that actually > posted but might be a start. >> >> Shawn >> >> >> On 2015-02-09 16:06, Steve Peterson wrote: >> > As I said, I did look through the archive for the old list but the >> > problem was that the list had been so erratic for so many months that >> > the only archive that remained online only had posts by a few >> > individuals. IIRC, there had been some problem switching over from an >> > old server and the really old (and really useful) archive was no >> > longer available. Now I see that even the archive that I looked >> > through is no longer online (not surprising, I guess). Dave McCue, if >> > you can reach him, *might* have some old stuff lying around, but I >> > wouldn't hold out much hope. >> > >> > --Steve >> > >> > >> > On 02/09/2015 12:15 PM, Richard Nakka wrote: >> >> Dave McCue, former SugPro list moderator, may have those files. >> >> >> >> >> >> On Mon, Feb 9, 2015 at 1:19 PM, Kenneth Irving <kenneth.irving@xxxxxxxxx> >> >> wrote: >> >>> What happened to the old list files? Are they still available somewhere? >> >>> Because maybe it could be useful to scrub all the emails from it and send >> >>> invitations to the former subscribers to join the new list, in case they >> >>> are >> >>> interested. I can help with that, but I'd need access to the old list >> >>> files. >> >>> >> >>> 2015-02-09 17:12 GMT-02:00 Steve Peterson <steve_peterson@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>: >> >>>> Only a couple of dozen people have subscribed. I'm sure the link will >> >>>> help...as will Michael's effort. I'm a noob at list moderation and only >> >>>> "signed up" to do this because no one else was making any visible >> >>>> effort to >> >>>> get the list going again. As for Michael's question about the Freelists >> >>>> "webpage", I have no idea what Freelists means by that and I haven't >> >>>> had any >> >>>> time to really dig down and investigate it. Maybe it should point to >> >>>> Richard's site--it's got to be the most complete (not to mention >> >>>> safety-oriented) site out there. >> >>>> --Steve >> >>>> >> >>>> >> >>>> On 02/09/2015 09:17 AM, Richard Nakka wrote: >> >>>>> Steve, >> >>>>> Just wondering, how many people are currently on this new list? I was >> >>>>> under the impression that the 'whole group' from SugPro was on >> >>>>> it....guess I was wrong. I've also been wondering how may people are >> >>>>> still active in sugar rocketry. I've been particularly active the past >> >>>>> 6 months or so, immensely enjoying building and launching KNSB >> >>>>> powered rockets. >> >>>>> >> >>>>> I will add a link on my website to the new list. >> >>>>> >> >>>>> Richard >> >>>>> >> >>>>> >> >>>>> >> >>>>> On Mon, Feb 9, 2015 at 10:31 AM, Steve Peterson >> >>>>> <steve_peterson@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >>>>>> As the moderator and re-creator of the list, I did once consider >> >>>>>> trying >> >>>>>> to >> >>>>>> contact everyone on the old list but I wasn't able to scavenge enough >> >>>>>> email >> >>>>>> addresses from the old list's archive to make it worth the effort. I >> >>>>>> still >> >>>>>> hope that people will pass the word along and we'll get most of the >> >>>>>> old >> >>>>>> members back. However, I have to say that I'm beginning to wonder just >> >>>>>> how >> >>>>>> many people are still active with sugar propellants (or even rocketry >> >>>>>> in >> >>>>>> general). >> >>>>>> >> >>>>>> --Steve >> >>>>>> >> >>>>>> On 02/09/2015 07:59 AM, Kenneth Irving wrote: >> >>>>>> >> >>>>>> Michael: yes, it's a shame that the list list was recreated but the >> >>>>>> users >> >>>>>> weren't told or weren't included by default in the new list. That >> >>>>>> would've >> >>>>>> simplified everything. A long time has passed and the community has >> >>>>>> been >> >>>>>> lost. I hope it can be recreated. >> >>>>>> >> >>>>>> best regards >> >>>>>> Kenneth >> >>>>>> >> >>>>>> 2015-02-09 13:14 GMT-02:00 Michael Monteith >> >>>>>> <dmarc-noreply@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>: >> >>>>>>> Looks like the old list is gone. I think the biggest problem is >> >>>>>>> people >> >>>>>>> don't know how to find this list. If this works maybe I can send to >> >>>>>>> people >> >>>>>>> I know and pass the word around. >> >>>>>>> >> >>>>>>> Michael Monteith >> >>>>>>> >> >>>> >> >> >> >> >