RR
My lousy lap top sends before I finish texting without me hitting send?
Repeating.
So you finally agreed with something I posted? Again, it would be nice if you
responded to some of my more difficult posts so that not only I, but the net
and my
Bcc list could see your response?
The long term problem is that many, many people come here with many different
cultures including my parents from Poland and Russia and spoke most often in
Yiddish which is how I learned it, until they both studied English and other
things and
both became naturalized citizens. Our history is full of immigrants who added
greatly
to our progress, for example, Bob Hope who was invited to sleep at the White
House
by many Presidents. It is a chance you have to take, some times you win and some
times you lose.
Stan the offspring of immigrants
-----Original Message-----
From: Ron Ristad <ristad@xxxxxxxxxxx>
To: sparkscoffee <sparkscoffee@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Wed, Feb 1, 2017 11:16 am
Subject: [sparkscoffee] Re: The Truth About Trump's 'Muslim Ban'
I agree 100% but that doesn't mean that we should allow them to immigrate to
our country if they can't assimilate into our culture.
Neither should we be dropping bombs on their countries or interfering with
their governments.
-----Original Message-----
From: dmarc-noreply@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Feb 1, 2017 10:04 AM
To: sparkscoffee@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [sparkscoffee] Re: The Truth About Trump's 'Muslim Ban'
Schalestock and everyone else
The problem is that there is about 1 billion of them we can't ignore and not
all of them
follow all the old rules and I suspect most all old religions have similar
crazy rules?
Stan the mediator
-----Original Message-----
From: schalestock <schalestock@xxxxxxxx>
To: sparkscoffee <sparkscoffee@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Tue, Jan 31, 2017 4:17 pm
Subject: [sparkscoffee] Re: The Truth About Trump's 'Muslim Ban'
Tricky question Richard. I don't like people that adheres to a sick, medieval
religion that not condones but encourages murder "non believers" and the
institutionalized abuse of their own women. Hope that clears it up for you.
---------- Original Message ----------
From: Richard Freedland <gadaoman2@xxxxxxxxx>
To: sparkscoffee@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [sparkscoffee] Re: The Truth About Trump's 'Muslim Ban'
Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2017 10:34:10 -0500
[Warning for those in Rio Linda: contents contain sarcasm.]
John,
I've tried adjusting the font size every which way, but I'm still having
trouble reading between the lines in your email. Are you saying that you don't
like Muslims?
73,
Richard Freedland
Miami
Sent from my iPad.
On Jan 31, 2017, at 8:43 AM, "schalestock@xxxxxxxx" <schalestock@xxxxxxxx>
wrote:
Hell Richard , if we're all painting with broad brushes now, count me in!
I say, ban ALL Muslims! ( I would be willing to throw them their goats pigs and
burka clad alleged "females"" and time warp them back to the 7th century as an
alternative)
But failing that, hell yes ban these head chopping scumbags. And don't float
the red herring about not "all" Muslims... All Muslims DO pray to Allah and
follow the Koran. Which gives explicit instructions on stoning, head chopping
and general abuse of women. Fuck them all. There's never been a more
appropriate group of people to nuke in the history of the world.
But most importantly of all in my opinion is that we LOCK UP that psychopathic
bitch that left our men to die in Benghazi.
Just my humble opinion of course.. I could let you know how I really feel.
JS
---------- Original Message ----------
From: Richard Freedland <gadaoman2@xxxxxxxxx>
To: sparkscoffee@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [sparkscoffee] Re: The Truth About Trump's 'Muslim Ban'
Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2017 01:38:53 -0500
You can interpret, excuse or massage his words any way you wish, but the fact
remains that on December 7, 2015, Donald Trump called for "a total and
complete shutdown of Muslims entering the United States." I stand by my
original email on the subject: Trump wanted to ban all Muslims in 2015, and I
believe he would like to impose a ban on all Muslims today if he could.
As for your asinine assertion that I believe "'being a rat' is perfectly
acceptable," let's review the facts: I never reported you to anyone, and I
never revealed any information that could be used to identify you. What I did
was to contact author Andy Weir and ask him if he agreed with you, that it was
acceptable and legal for "an acquaintance of mine" to post a link that allowed
others to download "The Martian" without paying for it. Not surprisingly, Andy
said you were wrong. This was not ratting out or snitching by anyone's
definition except, apparently, yours. You responded with some infantile
name-calling (e.g., "Rich the snitch") and made it clear to everyone that you
don't like to be questioned, corrected or contradicted, even when you're
obviously wrong. (More examples available on request.)
Finally, regarding that recent poll alleging that most Muslims support ISIS,
here's another recent poll that says just the opposite:
http://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2015/11/17/in-nations-with-significant-muslim-populations-much-disdain-for-isis/#comments
Go figure.
Sent from my iPad.
On Jan 30, 2017, at 7:37 PM, Ron Ristad <ristad@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
What he said was a complete ban on Muslims entering the U.S. "until we figure
out what the hell is going on."
Sounds reasonable to me. Since he made that statement he has had more time to
study the situation and has modified his stance to only banning Muslim
countries that support terrorism.
Once again sounds perfectly reasonable to me.
Or am I missing something? Why is Chuck Schuman actually crying about it and
calling Trump un-American?
Everything I say is my opinion. I try to include links whenever possible. I'll
be the first one to admit that I don't know everything. In fact what I believe
is that I don't really know anything. Seriously. When so many people lie how
can anybody be certain of anything? All one can do is form opinions based on
very limited knowledge.
What I meant by my statement regarding you is that I understand and respect not
wanting to be an informer. You've demonstrated that you believe that "being a
rat" is perfectly acceptable, and so should find it even more extraordinary
that no Muslim has ever turned in another Muslim terrorist even when they knew
what they were doing.
I can understand several reasons why somebody would not report a Muslim
terrorist. (1) Honor. (2) Fear of retribution. (3) Fear of being called a
racist by the Jew left wing media if not a Muslim.
According to a recent poll, 81% of all Muslims support ISIS. That doesn't mean
they support terrorism. Probably very few do. But it still represents a serious
problem when it comes to immigration.
https://muslimstatistics.wordpress.com/2015/10/15/poll-81-of-muslims-around-the-world-support-islamic-state-al-jazeera-arabic-poll/
-RR
-----Original Message-----
From: Richard Freedland <gadaoman2@xxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Jan 30, 2017 5:21 PM
To: sparkscoffee@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [sparkscoffee] Re: The Truth About Trump's 'Muslim Ban'
RR,
As requested, here is a video of Trump uttering the exact words that I quoted
verbatim from the official Donald J. Trump website:
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/video/2015/dec/08/donald-trump-calls-for-complete-ban-on-muslims-entering-the-us-video
How come you couldn't find that video? Did you look? Do you suspect that the
speaker in the video is not really Donald Trump? Alec Baldwin, perhaps?
Here's a suggestion: Your credibility would be much enhanced if, instead of
writing (as you did originally), "...[none, zero] Muslim Americans have turned
in Muslim terrorists they knew about," you wrote: I KNOW OF none, zero Muslim
Americans who have turned in Muslim terrorists they knew about." In fact, you
should make it a point to always preface your absurd comments and "alternative
facts" with the words "I believe" or "In my opinion" or "As far as I know."
That way, the reader will know to treat your pontifications with the skepticism
they deserve. (Examples available on request.)
I don't understand what you're trying to say in your last paragraph. Do you?
73,
Richard Freedland
Miami
Sent from my iPad.
On Jan 30, 2017, at 5:30 PM, Ron Ristad <ristad@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Richard,
Could you please provide a link to the video which shows him saying this? Many
times the things people say are taken out of context.
Or is this just something you read in one of your liberal rags who have been
proven to be biased if not outright liars?
I know "none, zero" because I know of I know of none, zero. This was
highlighted by the two Muslim shooters in California who had homemade bombs
lying all around their apartment and lots of Muslim visitors were not
terrorists.
I understand the New York mindset of "not getting involved", but I posted a
link for friend on is this group to a torrent to download a book and you wasted
no time in reporting me to the author because you thought that what I was doing
was illegal.
-RR
-----Original Message-----
From: Richard Freedland <gadaoman2@xxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Jan 30, 2017 2:35 PM
To: sparkscoffee@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [sparkscoffee] Re: The Truth About Trump's 'Muslim Ban'
Just how does "a total and complete shutdown of Muslims entering the United
States" differ from "ALL" Muslims?
And what do you mean by "maybe you are correct?" Those were Trump's words, not
mine. There's nothing there for me to be correct or incorrect about.
By the way, how do you know that "none, zero" Muslim Americans have turned in
Muslim terrorists they knew about?
Finally, as for your being obsessed: No, no, no! You're not obsessed.
Definitely not! Anyone who reads your posts can see that that's not the case!
Sent from my iPhone.
On Jan 30, 2017, at 2:35 PM, Ron Ristad <ristad@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
He can't change his mind?
But most likely he was using the word "Muslim" the same way that you criticize
me for using the word "Jew". It doesn't mean ALL Muslims just like it doesn't
mean ALL Jews. That's the way I would read it.
But maybe you are correct. How many Muslim Americans have turned in Muslim
terrorists they knew about? Answer: None, zero.
It was the same with all the Jews who had subverted the U.S. Government in the
1950's and were selling nuclear secrets to the Soviet Union. There were many
Jews who knew about it but never said anything. Not one. Why not?
The Rosenbergs were the only two people in American history ever executed for
treason. And not just because they were traitors and were the leaders of a huge
spy ring of other Jews, but because they sold those secrets for big money. They
were just plain greedy.
But I am just obsessed, right?
-----Original Message-----
From: Richard Freedland <gadaoman2@xxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Jan 30, 2017 1:10 PM
To: sparkscoffee@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [sparkscoffee] Re: The Truth About Trump's 'Muslim Ban'
RR,
It may not be a Muslim ban now, but Trump proposed exactly that in 2015. Here
is the first sentence of his statement, which can be found in its entirety at
www.donaldjtrump.com:
(New York, NY) December 7th, 2015, -- Donald J. Trump is calling for a total
and complete shutdown of Muslims entering the United States until our country's
representatives can figure out what is going on.
It's reasonable to assume that he would still like to institute a "total and
complete" Muslim ban if only he could.
73,
Richard Freedland
Miami
Sent from my iPad.
On Jan 30, 2017, at 12:32 PM, Ron Ristad <ristad@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Did you even bother to watch the video?
It is not a Muslim ban. It is only a ban on countries that export terrorists
and does not include the 6 countries with the largest Muslim populations. Obama
issued many such travel bans during his presidency and the commie news media
never said a word. Now commie Jew Chuck Schumer is on TV actually CRYING and
calling Trump un-American.
Trump called Schumer's performance bad acting.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DmiLmWNMxLk
-----Original Message-----
From: sblumen123@xxxxxxx
Sent: Jan 30, 2017 10:58 AM
To: sparkscoffee@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [sparkscoffee] The Truth About Trump's 'Muslim Ban'
Everyone
Oops, meant to also mention that the 'Muslim Ban' is a difficult problem about
safety for our citizens and the very human needs of refugees caused by our
military intervention in Muslim dominated country affairs? The Jewish Press
compares this problem with denying the Jewish refugees on the German
Spirit of St Louis passenger ship to land in Cuba, here and Canada. Mainly
that the ban by President Trump is too severe.
Stan the Jew
-----Original Message-----
From: Ron Ristad <ristad@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Mon, Jan 30, 2017 10:56 am
Subject: [sparkscoffee] The Truth About Trump's 'Muslim Ban'
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JNu4xU9qOEM
Users Change your settings here: //www.freelists.org/list/sparkscoffee ;
Unsubscribe/Subscribe and more commands are available for you. List owner:
n1ea@xxxxxxxx
Users Change your settings here: //www.freelists.org/list/sparkscoffee ;
Unsubscribe/Subscribe and more commands are available for you. List owner:
n1ea@xxxxxxxx
Users Change your settings here: //www.freelists.org/list/sparkscoffee ;
Unsubscribe/Subscribe and more commands are available for you. List owner:
n1ea@xxxxxxxx
Users Change your settings here: //www.freelists.org/list/sparkscoffee ;
Unsubscribe/Subscribe and more commands are available for you. List owner:
n1ea@xxxxxxxx
Users Change your settings here: //www.freelists.org/list/sparkscoffee ;
Unsubscribe/Subscribe and more commands are available for you. List owner:
n1ea@xxxxxxxx
____________________________________________________________
1 Odd Method 'Restores' Your 20/20 Vision. Try This Tonight
The Lost Ways
http://thirdpartyoffers.juno.com/TGL3132/589094a69647d14a650ebst02vuc
Users Change your settings here: //www.freelists.org/list/sparkscoffee ;
Unsubscribe/Subscribe and more commands are available for you.List owner:
n1ea@xxxxxxxx
