[SI-LIST] Re: Spectre S-parameter based modeling- Stability issues
- From: "Taha Amiralli" <thamiral@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: si-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Sun, 3 Dec 2006 08:52:42 -0500
It is likely that applying an inverse DFT, on a freq response obtained by
non-passive and non-causal matrices, could result in an unstable time
response.
I would say that the best approach to this problem would be to try and
enforce passivity/causality on the S-parameter matrices as suggested by
Madhu and endorsed by Patrick. I would assume that the a simple check of the
accuracy of the vector fitted data would be accomplished by comparing the
freq response of both the vector fit data and the original data. This would
help circumvent the second point brought up by Patrick.
I am however curious, if these interconnects are Power lines, why is it that
one would require a transient/freq analysis :) Its not like there are timing
issues that need to be maintained at each branch in the power line node...
Yes there could be the issue of finding out how long it takes power to
appear at some obscure end of the device before letting the reset circuitry
pull the device out of reset, but cant that be done via theoretical
calculations with a bit of extra delay as insuarance?
Sincerely,
-------------------
Taha Amiralli
thamiral [A] uwo [D] ca
thamiral [A] gmail [D] com
MESc Candidate 2007, Computer Engineering
The University Of Western Ontario
BESc, BSc. 2005,
Computer Engineering & Computer Science
The University Of Western Ontario
---------------------------------------------------------------
On 12/2/06, Ihsan Erdin <erdinih@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Madhusudanan,
> If you're dealing with the power planes there's a good chance the port
> loads
> are linear (decoupling caps and their parasitics, etc.) Then why bother
> with
> the time domain simulations and painful data constraintment? Just use a
> linear frequency domain simulator and get the time domain results by DFT
> in
> a straightforward manner.
>
> Regards
>
> Ihsan
>
> On 12/2/06, Madhusudanan K Sampath <mkeezhve@xxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > Hi All,
> > I am using n-port component in spectre to perform time domain simulation
> > using touchstone s-parameter files for power planes which are obtained
> > from
> > measurement/full wave tools. In many cases, the simulation explodes due
> to
> > stability reasons. What are the possible causes of this and how can one
> > solve this issue. I think Spectre n-port component uses convolution
> > methods
> > to perform time domain simulation from frequency domain s-parameter data
> > and
> > hence are prone to convergence issues. If so how does it enforce
> passivity
> > in the model. I verified the s-parameter matrix for eigenvalues and it
> > proves the data is not passive. I would like to compensate for passivity
> > and
> > then re-try the time domain simulation. There are quite a few
> interesting
> > passivity enforcements techniques in literature by Dr. B. Gustavsen and
> Dr
> > S.G. Talocia . However they are applied on the rational functions which
> > are
> > obtained by vector fitting the data. My question is if I vector fit the
> > data, enforce the passivity using these techniques and then
> calculate the
> > S-parameter matrix for each frequency point from the passive rational
> > function model. Will spectre give stable results with this new data ?
> >
> > Please share your ideas and views on this. Thanks in advance.
> >
> > Madhu
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > ------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe from si-list:
> > si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the Subject field
> >
> > or to administer your membership from a web page, go to:
> > //www.freelists.org/webpage/si-list
> >
> > For help:
> > si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'help' in the Subject field
> >
> > List FAQ wiki page is located at:
> > http://si-list.org/wiki/wiki.pl?Si-List_FAQ
> >
> > List technical documents are available at:
> > http://www.si-list.org
> >
> > List archives are viewable at:
> > //www.freelists.org/archives/si-list
> > or at our remote archives:
> > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/si-list/messages
> > Old (prior to June 6, 2001) list archives are viewable at:
> > http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu
> >
> >
> >
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe from si-list:
> si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the Subject field
>
> or to administer your membership from a web page, go to:
> //www.freelists.org/webpage/si-list
>
> For help:
> si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'help' in the Subject field
>
> List FAQ wiki page is located at:
> http://si-list.org/wiki/wiki.pl?Si-List_FAQ
>
> List technical documents are available at:
> http://www.si-list.org
>
> List archives are viewable at:
> //www.freelists.org/archives/si-list
> or at our remote archives:
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/si-list/messages
> Old (prior to June 6, 2001) list archives are viewable at:
> http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu
>
>
>
--
------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from si-list:
si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the Subject field
or to administer your membership from a web page, go to:
//www.freelists.org/webpage/si-list
For help:
si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'help' in the Subject field
List FAQ wiki page is located at:
http://si-list.org/wiki/wiki.pl?Si-List_FAQ
List technical documents are available at:
http://www.si-list.org
List archives are viewable at:
//www.freelists.org/archives/si-list
or at our remote archives:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/si-list/messages
Old (prior to June 6, 2001) list archives are viewable at:
http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu
Other related posts:
