[SI-LIST] Re: Re : maybe something wrong in ebd definition?

  • From: "Jon Powell" <jonpowell@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: <cat_carl@xxxxxxxxx>, <si-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Mon, 22 Sep 2003 08:27:06 -0700

I think you are right. There is not enough information. Ideally if this is
supposed to be a distributed transmission line it would be defined in terms
of Z S and Length. With L C and length you can translate to Z S and length
and then you would not have the lumped problem.
If this was really supposed to be discrete L and C elements there should
have been more nodes defined to give order.

regards,
jon

(ps: Len=0 is rather suspicious at any rate, that being impossible in a real
world situation).


-----Original Message-----
From: si-list-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:si-list-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]On
Behalf Of cat
Sent: Monday, September 22, 2003 4:37 PM
To: si-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [SI-LIST] Re : maybe something wrong in ebd defination?


    Oh, I am really eager to know the answer.And if you are not sure,I still
hope you can communicate with me.If there is something wrong totally,please
let me know.

resend the message:

     I think the description of [path description]section of the ebd file is
not detailed enough.I got confused when I meet such condition:
Node A
Len=0 L=2 C=1
Node B

Should I represent it like this:


   B <---@@@@@----------|--------------->A
         L=1            |
                        |
                       === C=1
                        |
                       ---
or like this:


   B <-------|------------@@@@@------------>A
             |              L
             |
             |
           =====C
             |
            ---
By the way,should the capacitor be connected to ground or power? How to
determine this ?
In fact , I found many cases like the above one in the DIMM ebd file
supplied by molex.
Maybe both representation is just the same? Or there is some description I
did not noticed?Or this is really a oversight?
any response will be appreciated.
   cat
                cat_carl@xxxxxxxxx
                    2003-09-19

                     With best regards





------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from si-list:
si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the Subject field

or to administer your membership from a web page, go to:
//www.freelists.org/webpage/si-list

For help:
si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'help' in the Subject field

List archives are viewable at:
                //www.freelists.org/archives/si-list
or at our remote archives:
                http://groups.yahoo.com/group/si-list/messages
Old (prior to June 6, 2001) list archives are viewable at:
                http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu



------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from si-list:
si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the Subject field

or to administer your membership from a web page, go to:
//www.freelists.org/webpage/si-list

For help:
si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'help' in the Subject field

List archives are viewable at:     
                //www.freelists.org/archives/si-list
or at our remote archives:
                http://groups.yahoo.com/group/si-list/messages 
Old (prior to June 6, 2001) list archives are viewable at:
                http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu
  

Other related posts: