I would have thought that the first decision cut would be the probes? Who has the better probe set? -----Original Message----- From: si-list-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:si-list-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Eugene Ivanov Sent: Friday, April 17, 2009 7:27 AM To: praveen kumar Cc: si-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: [SI-LIST] Re: Pros/Cons of Agilent vs Tek scope for DDR2/DDR3 characterization My problem with Agilent scope is that it doesn't support a crossover measurement of the dif signal as a standalone application, only as a part of the compliance test. Another usefull feature Agilent missing is gating the measurements by cursors. For instance, I'm looking at DQS Read immediately followed by DQS Write and want to make a crossover measurements only on DQS Write (or just first DQS Write transition) - the situation where On-die termination turns-off on the controller and turns-on on the memory. I've been told the work-around on Agilent is to zoom into the area of concern. But it won't work with Infiniscan triggers From: praveen kumar [mailto:ypk705@xxxxxxxxx] Sent: Thursday, April 16, 2009 11:39 PM To: Eugene Ivanov Cc: si-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: Re: [SI-LIST] Pros/Cons of Agilent vs Tek scope for DDR2/DDR3 characterization Eugene From the probing easiness for DDR, agilent makes life easier but the tek has come out with a DDR analysis s/w and trimode probes which are worth trying. Check it out.. Regards YPK On Fri, Apr 17, 2009 at 9:37 AM, Eugene Ivanov <eugene.ivanov@xxxxxxx<mailto:eugene.ivanov@xxxxxxx>> wrote: Need to make a selection of which scope to buy for DDR2/3 i/f JEDEC compliance testing on the memory controller(s). I personally like Tek scope but it is more expensive and its DDR compliance test software doesn't support all the required parameters. Did anybody evaluate both scopes for this application and which one you picked? What were pros/cons to go with Tek vs Agilent or vice versa? Thanks in advance ------------------------------------------------------------------ To unsubscribe from si-list: si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> with 'unsubscribe' in the Subject field or to administer your membership from a web page, go to: //www.freelists.org/webpage/si-list For help: si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> with 'help' in the Subject field List technical documents are available at: http://www.si-list.net<http://www.si-list.net/> List archives are viewable at: //www.freelists.org/archives/si-list or at our remote archives: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/si-list/messages Old (prior to June 6, 2001) list archives are viewable at: http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu ------------------------------------------------------------------ To unsubscribe from si-list: si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the Subject field or to administer your membership from a web page, go to: //www.freelists.org/webpage/si-list For help: si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'help' in the Subject field List technical documents are available at: http://www.si-list.net List archives are viewable at: //www.freelists.org/archives/si-list or at our remote archives: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/si-list/messages Old (prior to June 6, 2001) list archives are viewable at: http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu ------------------------------------------------------------------ To unsubscribe from si-list: si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the Subject field or to administer your membership from a web page, go to: //www.freelists.org/webpage/si-list For help: si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'help' in the Subject field List technical documents are available at: http://www.si-list.net List archives are viewable at: //www.freelists.org/archives/si-list or at our remote archives: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/si-list/messages Old (prior to June 6, 2001) list archives are viewable at: http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu