Hi all, Am doing timing analysis for DDR3 interface with Hyperlynx. I need to validate the DDR3 controller and DRAM IBIS models before using them in simulations. Both the models have some amount of initial time delays in their V-t curves. I understand that this initial non-switching time should be removed from the IBIS models before using them in timing analysis for source synchronous interfaces like DDR3. Have a few questions now... 1. How much will be impact of this "removing initial delays" on the setup and hold time margins? 2. If the initial non-switching delay be removed, why it should be specified in the IBIS model first? Excluding the relative delay between different V-t tables. 3. If the initial delays has to be removed, what should be the % Voltage Threshold I should use? Also, are there any standard timing specification for DDR3 Controller? We are yet to receive that from the ASIC vendor, but wanted to go with default timing spec. Right now we are in the process of delay matching the addr./Clock/DQ/DQS group. So this information will of much help. For strict timing analysis, should I have to include the package delays also (Delay from die to pin) of DDR3 compliant DRAM in the timing margin calculations? Regards, Pugazh ------------------------------------------------------------------ To unsubscribe from si-list: si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the Subject field or to administer your membership from a web page, go to: //www.freelists.org/webpage/si-list For help: si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'help' in the Subject field List technical documents are available at: http://www.si-list.net List archives are viewable at: //www.freelists.org/archives/si-list Old (prior to June 6, 2001) list archives are viewable at: http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu