[SI-LIST] Re: A question about clock EMC

  • From: steve weir <weirsi@xxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: jasonleehan@xxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Tue, 01 Jan 2008 18:52:17 -0800

Han,  if you have an emissions problem from the clock line that lies 
above the clock frequency, then the clock signal rise-time could be an 
issue.  Your consultant is suggesting that you slow down the rise-time.  
I don't know the particulars of your system, but I would be inclined to 
try and keep the line from radiating first, and attack the rise-time 
only if that is not feasible. 

If you do want to slow down the rise time, an R-C-R network would be a 
better choice than an R-C.  The R-C largely defeats the reflected 
termination function of the termination resistor.  This could cause 
unwanted signal integrity problems with the clock.  An R-C-R network, 
the second R is close to the desired termination resistance, and the 
first R is substantially smaller, typically 1/5th.

The RC time constant that you are after is one that:

* Is significantly smaller than the bit interval.  Otherwise you 
introduce substantial timing distortion.
* Is significantly longer than the rise-time of the oscillator w/o the 
network.

But honestly, it sounds like your consultant is asking you to apply a 
band-aid before it is clear that you even have a problem.  Unless you do 
something unfortunate like provide a poor return path, or have a nasty 
package resonance, a single clock line should not be a problem.

Steve.


Han Li wrote:
> Hi, experts.
>       I am doing a board design, on which I have a 66MHz (3.3V), and a
> 25MHz(3.3) oscillator. I used seriese termination for these clock lines.
> topoloy like this
> [A]--[seriesRes]----------long line-------------[Load]
> [A] is clock source,  then resistor , then transmission line ,then load at
> end.
> But our EMC consultant recommended me to add a cap between series Resi and
> GND. The cap and resistor  are located very close. so topoloy now like this:
> [A]----[seriesRes]----------long line-------------[Load]
>                             |
>                           ----
>                           ----  ( capacitor)
>                             |
>                          GND
> He didnot recommentd cap's value, only  said it  may help EMC  test.
> I understand that such a cap can increase clock rising time and reduce
> frequency spectra. BUT, donnot we creat a matched transmission line using
> series resistor? Why intentionally add a cap to destroy such a matched line?
> Can I really get a good EMC result?
> Could anyone provide a deeped and more detailed explanation on this?
> Thank  you very much.
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe from si-list:
> si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the Subject field
>
> or to administer your membership from a web page, go to:
> //www.freelists.org/webpage/si-list
>
> For help:
> si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'help' in the Subject field
>
>
> List technical documents are available at:
>                 http://www.si-list.net
>
> List archives are viewable at:     
>               //www.freelists.org/archives/si-list
> or at our remote archives:
>               http://groups.yahoo.com/group/si-list/messages
> Old (prior to June 6, 2001) list archives are viewable at:
>               http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu
>   
>
>
>
>   


-- 
Steve Weir
Teraspeed Consulting Group LLC 
121 North River Drive 
Narragansett, RI 02882 

California office
(408) 884-3985 Business
(707) 780-1951 Fax

Main office
(401) 284-1827 Business 
(401) 284-1840 Fax 

Oregon office
(503) 430-1065 Business
(503) 430-1285 Fax

http://www.teraspeed.com
This e-mail contains proprietary and confidential intellectual property of 
Teraspeed Consulting Group LLC
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Teraspeed(R) is the registered service mark of Teraspeed Consulting Group LLC

------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from si-list:
si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the Subject field

or to administer your membership from a web page, go to:
//www.freelists.org/webpage/si-list

For help:
si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'help' in the Subject field


List technical documents are available at:
                http://www.si-list.net

List archives are viewable at:     
                //www.freelists.org/archives/si-list
or at our remote archives:
                http://groups.yahoo.com/group/si-list/messages
Old (prior to June 6, 2001) list archives are viewable at:
                http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu
  

Other related posts: