What is not said, is that all board members should be allowed in the
discussion. The accused Helen and the accuser Larry were excluded. I, being
an
attorney, believe when accused, one should have the right to respond. They
should have been included since we voted them on to the board. They
should have been able to hear what the others said, and not only respond, but
vote on the decision.
Now we do not have the right to know the results, and I can't see how that
benefits the club, the breed, or the members. Perhaps our President will
inform the club what was decided.
Evan
http://gsdnational.blogspot.com/
http://www.dogshowjuniors.com/GSYRFindex.asp
http://asgardgermanshepherd.com/
In a message dated 9/21/2016 10:34:07 A.M. Pacific Daylight Time,
wynsum@xxxxxxx writes:
All testimony, discussions and written materials relating to the hearing
and charges will be held in
strictest confidence by the Board as well as by all involved parties,
including witnesses. Any party
violating this confidence shall be subject to disciplinary action.
