[ SHOWGSD-L ] BAD.... illustrated standard
- From: "Carolyn" <marhaven@xxxxxxx>
- To: <almanya@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, <showgsd-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, <EKOLAN1@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 15 Aug 2005 23:33:13 -0700
From: <almanya@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>To: <showgsd-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>I agree the illustrations in the current standard are primitive,,,,,,however
>the
>illustrations we saw in one of the previous versions did not depict a proper
>structure of our GSD at all ! They will have to have been improved immensely
>before
>it ever represents our breed to the best it can.............I was thoroughly
>disgusted with what i saw in the previous version.
> I believe the new PROPOSED illustrated standard whenever finished and not
> rushed to
> beat a deadline, should be sent to the membership for a vote. Something this
> important should never be the decision of 18 board members. And while i agree
> you
> won't please everyone, you will at least get a majority vote on the issue
> that will
> be with us for years to come. JMO> Amy Safdir
> Almanya Shepherds> www.almanyagsd.com
************************************************
I hear all the suggestions as to what we [the membership] don't want done but
no one is saying how they want it done. Is it that you want new people
handling the nis? And who is to say there will not be as many people object to
the
way they do it. Do you want every new page that is revised to be put to a vote
of the entire membership? We are going to need a lot of money to do it that
way. Really I do not agree or disagree with the objections being raised but
along with those objections you must submit your plan as to how you want it
handled. I suspect if all the membership were to submit a plan we might have
3000
plans out of 4000 members. Really when you object also along with the objection
send your plan. I mean this NOT in a sarcastic way who knows someone may
have a great idea that all 4000 of us will like. Fred Migliore
************************************
Well I sure don't have any suggestions how to please 4,000 people in a diverse
membership.........but I can suggest that if the new illustrated Standard is no
better than what we saw last time.......it is no improvement on what we already
have and therefore we should just save the money and leave it as it is!!!
If we cannot improve it artistically......then we can wisely save our money and
leave it alone until that is possible. We don't "need a change for changes
sake".
What is the harm in allowing Breeders and Judges and Exhibitors....MEMBERS...
to at least see the new improved version before it is put to a vote??
This is one of the single biggest driving forces in our visual on our Standard
and our daily decisions, whether Judging, chosing pups or entering shows.
RUSHING it through and forcing the Board to make an up or down vote on a
mediocre or bad version will be the single biggest mistake we can allow as an
entire membership of 4,000. WHY alienate a membership and waste the money
if it happens to be just mediocre or even bad?? I don't get it.....when did we
run out of TIME? No time for the membership??
GEEEEEZ.......even a space program has to be scrapped occasionally......
Carolyn marhaven@xxxxxxx
www.marhaven.com
============================================================================
POST is Copyrighted 2005. All material remains the property of the original
author and of GSD Communication, Inc. NO REPRODUCTIONS or FORWARDS of any kind
are permitted without prior permission of the original author AND of the
Showgsd-l Management. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.
ALL PERSONS ARE ON NOTICE THAT THE FORWARDING, REPRODUCTION OR USE IN ANY
MANNER OF ANY MATERIAL WHICH APPEARS ON SHOWGSD-L WITHOUT THE EXPRESS
PERMISSION OF ALL PARTIES TO THE POST AND THE LIST MANAGEMENT IS EXPRESSLY
FORBIDDEN, AND IS A VIOLATION OF LAW. VIOLATORS OF THIS PROHIBITION WILL BE
PROSECUTED.
For assistance, please contact the List Management at admin@xxxxxxxxxxxx
VISIT OUR WEBSITE - http://www.showgsd.org
============================================================================
Other related posts:
