How's the next build coming along? On Mon, 18 Oct 2004 14:31:35 -0600, Garrett Serack <gserack@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > yeah.. We're not going to let this impede a new stable build, no > worries. It is nice to be able to discuss this on the list during the > day tho'. :) > > I'm always subscribed to the scintilla list too, and nobody is > *actually* working on this right now. I would love to get the c++ > proxy in place, as that would allow us to build that ultimate lexer in > c# :) Pity about those native-code-guys :p > > So, the plan is : > > 1. Get to a stable build point. > 2. Build a scilexer proxy and Interface for C#, which lets folks build > their own in c# > 3a. Think about building a generic programmable lexer. > 3b. *Or* build a generator to build a C# lexer from a template, with a > config file for the parameters. One of Scintilla's strengths with the > lexing, is that it is not data-driven, and therefore, does not have to > do "interpretations" at runtime. > > Garrett > > On Mon, 18 Oct 2004 11:31:34 -0700 (PDT), > > > mike.griffin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > <mike.griffin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Can we just a get a build with find/replace and the editor syntax > > colorization working before we start on new features? > > > > > > > > > > >> as long as it is fun ;-) > > >> > > >> I didn't check C++ lexers yet, but my C++ is really really *rusty*, > > >> and I already have quite some experience in writing parsers in java and > > >> C#, > > >> therefore I would feel much more confortable. > > >> > > > No Problem. I'm crossing language barriers 5 ways everyday anyway > > > (C++,C#,Java,Javascript,vb*) > > > > > >> Also I am not completely happy with current lexers, e.g. I would like to > > >> change > > >> one for javascript so it can recognize properties and methods. etc. > > >> > > >> Are there any other issues, wishes that needs to be implemented (in > > >> c#),. > > >> soon I could spend some time on it....so..speak up ;-) > > > > > > Well, I'm going to see if I can squeeze in the code to get those > > > dialogs connected tonight. Past that I think we'll have to take > > > inventory on features/requests and see who can get what done. > > > > > > It's snowing like hell here today (*sigh*) so it's not like I'm going > > > anywhere tonight. I have probably this week to squeeze in code fixes > > > until my clients start sucking all my time again. > > > > > > If I get a chance here (onsite) this afternoon, I'll see if I can whip > > > up specs on what a C#-implemented lexer should look like :) > > > > > > G > > > -------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > ScintillaNET Mailing List: ScintillaNET@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > > > > > > To unsubscribe: Send an email to scintillanet-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > > > and put "unsubscribe" (without the quotes) in the Subject line. > > > > > > Web Page: http://tinyurl.com/yvoh2 > > > > > > > -------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > ScintillaNET Mailing List: ScintillaNET@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > > > > To unsubscribe: Send an email to scintillanet-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > > and put "unsubscribe" (without the quotes) in the Subject line. > > > > Web Page: http://tinyurl.com/yvoh2 > > > -------------------------------------------------------------------------- > ScintillaNET Mailing List: ScintillaNET@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > > To unsubscribe: Send an email to scintillanet-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > and put "unsubscribe" (without the quotes) in the Subject line. > > Web Page: http://tinyurl.com/yvoh2 > -------------------------------------------------------------------------- ScintillaNET Mailing List: ScintillaNET@xxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: Send an email to scintillanet-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx and put "unsubscribe" (without the quotes) in the Subject line. Web Page: http://tinyurl.com/yvoh2