[sac-board] Re: Dues
- From: Paul Dickson <dickson@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: sac-board@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Tue, 11 Jun 2002 16:50:00 -0700
On Tue, 11 Jun 2002 17:37:42 -0400, rhwalker@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> [...] Therefore I think continuing members should pay full price and
> the wording of any and all of our forms etc. should indicate this.
> Rich
We are also going to have to change the constitution to define what a
renewing member is. If someone was a member five years ago, and rejoins
this year, will he have to pay for all intervening years? The phrase "pay
all back dues" is rather vague.
-Paul
- Follow-Ups:
- [sac-board] Re: Dues
- From: Joseph R. Goss
- References:
- [sac-board] Dues
- From: rhwalker
Other related posts:
- » [sac-board] Dues
- » [sac-board] Re: Dues
- » [sac-board] Re: Dues
- » [sac-board] Re: Dues
- » [sac-board] Dues
- [sac-board] Re: Dues
- From: Joseph R. Goss
- [sac-board] Dues
- From: rhwalker