[rollei_list] Re: beautiful packaging
- From: todd belcher <todd_belcher@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Sat, 24 Feb 2007 13:18:09 -0800
It is a coating problem. Many of the Planars on the Rollei TLRs of
this period have lost or are losing their front coating - not all, or
lots, but many. The darkish areas on that lens are where the coating
remains, the brighter areas have no coating. You can imagine if you
removed all the coating it might be difficult to guess the coating,
was in fact, gone and in many cases, when the coating is partially
gone, a 'cheap fix' for an unscrupulous reseller is to completely
remove the coating.
The lens can be recoated, but it will, to a discerning eye, look
incorrect because this era 2.8 Planar has a yellowish front element
coating and most modern recoating will have a purple cast. Later 2.8
Planars do have a red/purple cast to them though.
Losing the coating on the lens will not have a terrible detrimental
effect on images and you'd be very hard pressed to tell any
difference between an image taken with this lens and a perfect lens.
There are 10 coated surfaces in the 2.8 Planar - losing the coating
on one surface is 10% and that 10% does not mean images made are 10%
'worse'. It means the maximum possible detrimental effect is 10% of
whatever percent the coating imparts to the image. So if coating
imparts 10% to an image then that one coating imparts 1%. And it
would be tough to discern a 1% difference in images.
todd
On 24-Feb-07, at 10:07 AM, Jeff Kelley wrote:
Eric, with that much of the coating gone why does it not have a
detrimental effect? Can a lens in this condition be recoated
successfully?
Jeff
I don't think so, I think it's a coating condition. I've seen it on
many if not most Planars of the era. In my experience it has no
effect
on performance...
Todd Belcher or Harry Fleenor might just in here...
Eric Goldstein
--
On 2/24/07, Jeff Kelley <thocker@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
The 6th photo, showing a closeup of the taking lens sure looks on
my monitor
like the lens has a serious separation or fungus problem. I
could be
reflections but I don't think so....
Here's a direct link to the photo:
http://worldsbestusedequipment.de/ebay/P2160125.JPG
- Jeff -
---
Rollei List
- Post to rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'subscribe'
in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org
- Unsubscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with
'unsubscribe' in the subject field OR by logging into
www.freelists.org
- Online, searchable archives are available at
http://www.freelists.org/archives/rollei_list
_________________________________________________________________
Play Flexicon: the crossword game that feeds your brain. PLAY now
for FREE. http://zone.msn.com/en/flexicon/default.htm?
icid=flexicon_hmtagline
---
Rollei List
- Post to rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'subscribe'
in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org
- Unsubscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with
'unsubscribe' in the subject field OR by logging into
www.freelists.org
- Online, searchable archives are available at
http://www.freelists.org/archives/rollei_list
---
Rollei List
- Post to rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'subscribe'
in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org
- Unsubscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with
'unsubscribe' in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org
- Online, searchable archives are available at
http://www.freelists.org/archives/rollei_list
- Follow-Ups:
- [rollei_list] Re: beautiful packaging
- From: Jeff Kelley
- [rollei_list] Little locomotive from 1897
- From: Carlos Manuel Freaza
- References:
- [rollei_list] Re: beautiful packaging
- From: Jeff Kelley
Other related posts:
- » [rollei_list] beautiful packaging
- » [rollei_list] Re: beautiful packaging
- » [rollei_list] Re: beautiful packaging
- » [rollei_list] Re: beautiful packaging
- » [rollei_list] Re: beautiful packaging
- » [rollei_list] Re: beautiful packaging
- » [rollei_list] Re: beautiful packaging
- » [rollei_list] Re: beautiful packaging
- » [rollei_list] Re: beautiful packaging
- » [rollei_list] Re: beautiful packaging
Jeff
I don't think so, I think it's a coating condition. I've seen it onmany if not most Planars of the era. In my experience it has no effecton performance... Todd Belcher or Harry Fleenor might just in here... Eric Goldstein -- On 2/24/07, Jeff Kelley <thocker@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:The 6th photo, showing a closeup of the taking lens sure looks on my monitor like the lens has a serious separation or fungus problem. I could bereflections but I don't think so.... Here's a direct link to the photo: http://worldsbestusedequipment.de/ebay/P2160125.JPG - Jeff ---- Rollei List - Post to rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx- Subscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'subscribe' in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org- Unsubscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org- Online, searchable archives are available at http://www.freelists.org/archives/rollei_list
_________________________________________________________________Play Flexicon: the crossword game that feeds your brain. PLAY now for FREE. http://zone.msn.com/en/flexicon/default.htm? icid=flexicon_hmtagline
--- Rollei List - Post to rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx- Subscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'subscribe' in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org
- Unsubscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org
- Online, searchable archives are available at http://www.freelists.org/archives/rollei_list
- [rollei_list] Re: beautiful packaging
- From: Jeff Kelley
- [rollei_list] Little locomotive from 1897
- From: Carlos Manuel Freaza
- [rollei_list] Re: beautiful packaging
- From: Jeff Kelley