[rollei_list] Re: Triotar
- From: "Peter K." <peterk727@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Sun, 9 Oct 2005 13:41:45 -0700
Thanks Jerry, now I get it.
Peter "Planar Man" K.
On 10/9/05, Jerry Lehrer <jerryleh@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Peter,
>
> I believe that J Patric is correct in his assertion, but Eric is
> too sweeping in his judgment, The Rollei 6x6 with Triotar
> is capable of producing very fine 8x10 portraits. The Rollei
> 35, with 40mm Triotar is NOT. All triplets are not created
> equal.
>
> Jerry
>
> "Peter K." wrote:
>
> Best of the 3-element lenses? Is that like being queen of the pigs?
> On 10/9/05, *J Patric Dahlén* <jenspatricdahlen@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > >From: Neil:
> > >I have read some reports on Rolleicords where they implied that
> > anything
> > >with the Triotar lens was inadequate.
> > >What design is the Triotar anyway? A Cooke Triplet?
> > >I have had a 'Cord II with Triotar and I am satisfied with its
> > performance.
> > >I am not enlarging the negatives to any extreme degree.
> > >What are the limits of the Triotar?
> >
> > Triotar is one of the best three element lenses. Sharp and contrasty.
> > Only
> > one of five Triotars on my Rolleicords is soft (the 3,8). For bigger
> > enlargements than 24x24 cm I would prefer the Tessar, but each lens has
> > it's
> > own charm...
> >
> > Btw, I posted this yesterday:
> > http://www.photo.net/bboard/q-and-a-fetch-msg?msg_id=00DnaD
> >
> > /Patric
> >
> > ---
> > Rollei List
> >
> > - Post to rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >
> > - Subscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'subscribe'
> > in the subject field OR by logging into
> > www.freelists.org<//www.freelists.org/>
> >
> > - Unsubscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with
> > 'unsubscribe' in the subject field OR by logging into
> > www.freelists.org<//www.freelists.org/>
> >
> > - Online, searchable archives are available at
> > //www.freelists.org/archives/rollei_list
> >
> >
> --
> Peter K
> Ó¿Õ¬
>
>
--
Peter K
Ó¿Õ¬
Other related posts:
