[rollei_list] Re: Triotar
- From: "Peter K." <peterk727@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Sun, 9 Oct 2005 10:08:25 -0700
Best of the 3-element lenses? Is that like being queen of the pigs?
On 10/9/05, J Patric Dahlén <jenspatricdahlen@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> >From: Neil:
> >I have read some reports on Rolleicords where they implied that anything
> >with the Triotar lens was inadequate.
> >What design is the Triotar anyway? A Cooke Triplet?
> >I have had a 'Cord II with Triotar and I am satisfied with its
> performance.
> >I am not enlarging the negatives to any extreme degree.
> >What are the limits of the Triotar?
>
> Triotar is one of the best three element lenses. Sharp and contrasty. Only
> one of five Triotars on my Rolleicords is soft (the 3,8). For bigger
> enlargements than 24x24 cm I would prefer the Tessar, but each lens has
> it's
> own charm...
>
> Btw, I posted this yesterday:
> http://www.photo.net/bboard/q-and-a-fetch-msg?msg_id=00DnaD
>
> /Patric
>
>
> ---
> Rollei List
>
> - Post to rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> - Subscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'subscribe'
> in the subject field OR by logging into
> www.freelists.org<//www.freelists.org>
>
> - Unsubscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with
> 'unsubscribe' in the subject field OR by logging into
> www.freelists.org<//www.freelists.org>
>
> - Online, searchable archives are available at
> //www.freelists.org/archives/rollei_list
>
>
--
Peter K
Ó¿Õ¬
Other related posts:
