[rollei_list] Re: Storage Media [OT]

  • From: "Austin Franklin" <austin.franklin@xxxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: <rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Fri, 2 May 2008 13:34:44 -0400

Hi Eric,

I'm surprised you can't just post a link to some substantive info on the
issue.  Again, I'm not disputing anything you've said, but really, just
saying you have the answers and for others to do the research on their own
is really a cop-out IMO, hardly very informative much less helpful.  And it
certainly does leave your position in the realm of speculation.

Regards,

Austin

> -----Original Message-----
> From: rollei_list-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> [mailto:rollei_list-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of Eric Goldstein
> Sent: Friday, May 02, 2008 1:15 PM
> To: rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: [rollei_list] Re: Storage Media [OT]
>
>
> Too many errors and inaccuracies to keep posting here as we are OT...
> suggest folks do some research on their own and discover legitimate
> answers, as I have done for myself and my clients.
>
>
> Eric Goldstein
>
> --
>
> On 5/2/08, Neil Gould <neil@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > rollei_list Digest Thu, 01 May 2008 Volume: 04  Issue: 109
> >  >
> >
> >
> >  > On 5/1/08, Mark Rabiner <mark@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >  >> Those more expensive gold DVD's are supposed to be ok though.
> >  >>  I'm getting those.
> >  >>
> >  >>  Mark William Rabiner
> >  >>  markrabiner.com
> >  >
> >  They are not any better than other recordable DVD material.
> >
> >  and...
> >
> >  > From: Allen Zak <azak@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >  > Date: Thu, 1 May 2008 14:01:22 -0400
> >  >
> >  > Are there any media that offer "reasonable," if not archival,
> >  > longevity for digital files?
> >  >
> >  The honest answer is "no".
> >
> >  and...
> >
> >  > From: "Austin Franklin" <austin.franklin@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> >  > Date: Thu, 1 May 2008 14:16:33 -0400
> >  >
> >  > Hi Eric,
> >  >
> >  > I'd say hard drives (even if you burn two) would not be very
> >  > archival.  They still have an MTBF that is pretty low, and they
> >  > don't necessarily last well over time even if unused.
> >  >
> >  Exactly. "Archival" is supposed to be a lot longer than 20 years. Think
> >  "papyrus"...
> >
> >  and...
> >
> >  > From: Michael Eric Berube <pj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >
> > >
> >  > I agree that all burnable media is more volatile, but the files I
> >  > burned even cheap CDs in 2002 are still fine so far. I've
> had discs fail
> >  > when I was writing them, but so far, I've not had any fail afterwards
> >  and no
> >  > cases at all where /both/ copies of a particular disc failed in
> >  > storage.
> >  > Still, I don't take any chances and I keep copies of all archived
> >  > files on the external HDs too. I use multiple copies of
> both...external
> >  HDs,
> >  > unplugged unless I'm writing or reading to/from them...and Gold
> >  > CD/DVDs in cool, dry, vertical dark storage. When a new
> standard comes
> >  out
> >  > I'll make new copies of all of the 1s and 0s on that too and
> I encourage
> >  my
> >  > clients to do the same so that they "don't end up with their wedding
> >  > photos on 8-track." (Though increasingly I often now have to explain
> >  > what "8-track" means!)
> >  >
> >
> > Keeping 100 copies of your digital material just increases the odds that
> >  there will be a usable copy in 2 or 3 years. It is no guarantee that it
> >  will be usable in 20 years, much less 50 years.
> >
> >  About the best digital media that I've used were the
> opto-magnetic LS-120
> >  "Super Disks", where a laser is used to heat up the media and
> the magnetic
> >  material is re-oriented then "locked" in place when the media
> cools down.
> >  Unfortunately, the drives fail pretty quickly, are no longer available,
> >  and are only 120 megs. And, that's after less than 10 years.
> >
> >  Best,
> >
> >
> >  Neil
> >
> >
> >  ---
> >  Rollei List
> >
> >  - Post to rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >
> >  - Subscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'subscribe'
> >  in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org
> >
> >  - Unsubscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with
> >  'unsubscribe' in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org
> >
> >  - Online, searchable archives are available at
> >  //www.freelists.org/archives/rollei_list
> >
> >
> ---
> Rollei List
>
> - Post to rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> - Subscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'subscribe'
> in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org
>
> - Unsubscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with
> 'unsubscribe' in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org
>
> - Online, searchable archives are available at
> //www.freelists.org/archives/rollei_list
>
>

---
Rollei List

- Post to rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx

- Subscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'subscribe' 
in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org

- Unsubscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 
'unsubscribe' in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org

- Online, searchable archives are available at
//www.freelists.org/archives/rollei_list

Other related posts: