Thor und Larry, Don't let the guys BS you. Look up "munging" and "non-munging". It is super easy to respond to an individual. IF YOU REMEMBER HOW TO DO IT. I too have slipped and forgotten to erase the RUG address and put in the correct address. Jerry Thor Legvold wrote: > Laurence, > > if it does, you have a major problem. Another big "win" til Win.... > > Replying to a mailing list should reply to *the list*, not to the > individual who posted the message in question. That's the whole point > of having a mailing list :-). > > Which leads us back to the original posters original problem, how to > reply directly to an author and not to the list-at-large. > > It might very well be easy on Windows as well, but it shouldn't be > working as you state (I lived with that excuse for an OS ripped off > from technologies they got by being inside Apple while developing > "killer" apps for the Mac since the very first runtime library > distributed with Pagemaker betas somewhere around 1986 or so. Yes it's > gotten better. No it's nowhere close to being there yet. No denying > that BG is quite a talent when it comes to marketing, however.) > > Sorry about the last bit, this cold I have is killing me (sinuses) and > my patience is short. I've been in IT since at least the early 80's, > done VMS, done VM, done Unix, Dos, Windows, BeOS. In fact Mac OS is the > only OS I didn't have any experience with until quite recently. > NextStep was my OS of choice for many years (the WWW was originally > conceived by Tim Berners-Lee on a NeXT machine at CERN) , and really > incredible in pretty much any way imagineable. It was Steve Job's baby > after he got kicked out of Apple in the mid 80s. Lucky for me that OS X > is actually NextStep, just updated and modernized (and slightly, > irritatingly Mac-ified, but I can live with that :-). > > Back to camera talk. Anyone taken any nice shots with a Rolleiflex > lately? > > Cheers (and lots of coughing, sneezing and snot), > Thor > > (p.s. In the (rare) event that your "PC based solution" is not running > Windows, congratulations to you. However it's still functioning wrong > if it's replying in the way you describe). > > On 26 Nov, 2005, at 19:02, Laurence Cuffe wrote: > > > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: Bob Shell <bob@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > > Date: Saturday, November 26, 2005 1:14 pm > > Subject: [rollei_list] Re: Rolleiflex Sale > > > >> > >> On Nov 26, 2005, at 5:37 AM, Thor Legvold wrote: > >> > >>> On the Mac you just click on the little arrow to the right side > >> of > >>> an adress, then select from the pull-down menu ("Reply to Sender" > >> > >>> is what you want to choose). Couldn't be simpler. > > Mac heads! > > Simpler is to just hit the reply button, no little arrows, no pull-down > > menu's to search. Thats how it works on my PC based solution. > > All the best > > Larry Cuffe > > > > --- > Rollei List > > - Post to rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > > - Subscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'subscribe' > in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org > > - Unsubscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with > 'unsubscribe' in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org > > - Online, searchable archives are available at > //www.freelists.org/archives/rollei_list --- Rollei List - Post to rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx - Subscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'subscribe' in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org - Unsubscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org - Online, searchable archives are available at //www.freelists.org/archives/rollei_list