Aaron: I have found an interesting thread about the Rollei film, i.e. the following opinion: "jukka vatanen , may 03, 2005; 04:49 p.m. Hi Jukka here again: I wrote a response to another thread on the Rollei R3 film elsewhere in this forum. My summary here is: I shot Rollei R3 and Fuji Acros 100 and neopan 400 in two leica bodies, same lens : 35mm Summicron and same subject matter. The developer was the Rollei Low speed for 64-100 asa developed and diluted as per Rollei instructions. also r3 and neopan 400 shot at 800-1600 asa developed in Rollei High Speed developer with Rollei instructions for dilution and developement times. My impression is that the Rollei R3 film and developer cmbo is a fantastic advancement in film technology for a BW reportage photographer. It offers unique latitude in exposure, that is not possible with traditional films. rather than bracket exposures, now you can bracket development. Find new kind of images by selecting "layers of silver" in latent images. Technically the low speed 64-100 asa graininess is more apparent than in Acros 100, but then the acros is the finest grain film I have ever used. At high end (1600 asa) the density, contrast and gaininess is perfectly acceptable, directly comparable to Neopan 400. Quite a latitude for a single film ! BUT: you have to use the high tech Rollei developers. From other comment on the forum, no idea to use the old traditional developers such as D-76 or Diafine" The entire thread is here: http://www.photo.net/bboard/q-and-a-fetch-msg?msg_id=00Bivj All the best Carlos --- Aaron Reece <oboeaaron@xxxxxxx> escribió: > Richard, > > I had the same concerns when I first heard the > claims that this film > could be used anywhere from EI 25 to EI 6400. They > claim it has three > photosensitive layers, each with a different > sensitivity. That is why > you have to use the special developer to "unlock" > the multi-speed > capabilities (layers). With ordinary developers it > has a nominal speed > of ISO 400. At least, that's what they claim. I have > not used this film > myself. > > Cheers, > -Aaron > > On May 9, 2005, at 4:50 PM, Richard Knoppow wrote: > > > While its nice to have another supplier of film > around I > > am not too happy with this stuff being introduced > as somehow > > "magic" film which doesn't work like any other. > > --- > Rollei List > > - Post to rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > > - Subscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > with 'subscribe' > in the subject field OR by logging into > www.freelists.org > > - Unsubscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > with > 'unsubscribe' in the subject field OR by logging > into www.freelists.org > > - Online, searchable archives are available at > //www.freelists.org/archives/rollei_list > > ___________________________________________________________ 1GB gratis, Antivirus y Antispam Correo Yahoo!, el mejor correo web del mundo http://correo.yahoo.com.ar --- Rollei List - Post to rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx - Subscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'subscribe' in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org - Unsubscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org - Online, searchable archives are available at //www.freelists.org/archives/rollei_list