[rollei_list] Re: Okay -- SL66 vs. 2.8 TLR
- From: Jerry Lehrer <jerryleh@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Mon, 11 Sep 2006 22:29:22 -0700
Jeff,
I don't think so! The mass of the glass is due to the need for retrofocus
for normal and wide angle lenses. Ya gotta clear the flopping mirror.
Lenses for FP shutter equipped cameras can be faster than lenses
limited by between the lens shutters, thus bigger.
There is no "hidden goodness" there.
Jerry
Jeff Dilcher wrote:
> This is a dumb question, but, here goes...
>
> Is the image quality resulting from the "big" lens of an SL66 superior
> to those on TLRs?
>
> I would think for the size and weight of the chunks of glass on the
> SL66s, that there must be some kind of hidden goodness in there...
>
> ---
> Rollei List
>
> - Post to rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> - Subscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'subscribe'
> in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org
>
> - Unsubscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with
> 'unsubscribe' in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org
>
> - Online, searchable archives are available at
> //www.freelists.org/archives/rollei_list
>
> --
> No virus found in this incoming message.
> Checked by AVG Free Edition.
> Version: 7.0.405 / Virus Database: 268.12.3/444 - Release Date: 09/11/2006
---
Rollei List
- Post to rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'subscribe'
in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org
- Unsubscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with
'unsubscribe' in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org
- Online, searchable archives are available at
//www.freelists.org/archives/rollei_list
Other related posts:
