[rollei_list] Re: Okay -- SL66 vs. 2.8 TLR

The only differences would be by type, i.e. Tessar, Planar, Xenar, etc., and by the coating of the optics. The newest HFT lenses are the highest in contrast, overall and micro.
On the other hand, the quality of your prints will more than likely be determined by the projection (enlarger) lens. There you have to weight what your pocket-book will bear.

Slobodan Dimitrov
Studio G-8,
Angels Gate Cultural Center
http://sdimitrovphoto.com





On Sep 11, 2006, at 8:08 PM, Jeff Dilcher wrote:


This is a dumb question, but, here goes...

Is the image quality resulting from the "big" lens of an SL66 superior
to those on TLRs?

I would think for the size and weight of the chunks of glass on the
SL66s, that there must be some kind of hidden goodness in there...



---
Rollei List

- Post to rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx

- Subscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'subscribe'
in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org

- Unsubscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with
'unsubscribe' in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org

- Online, searchable archives are available at
http://www.freelists.org/archives/rollei_list

---
Rollei List

- Post to rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx

- Subscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'subscribe' in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org

- Unsubscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org

- Online, searchable archives are available at
http://www.freelists.org/archives/rollei_list

Other related posts: