[rollei_list] Okay -- SL66 vs. 2.8 TLR
- From: Craig Roberts <crgrbrts@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Mon, 11 Sep 2006 16:59:22 -0400
Ooops! Sometimes we compose a new message in the "Reply" mode and forget
to change the subject line. At least that's what I did :-) .
So --
Here's a puzzler for Rolleites --
You can keep only one:
1) SL66 -- big, heavy and noisy, but versatile with lens
interchangeability, quick film changes (with magazines), macro ability
and tilt feature, or
2) 2.8C, D or E -- small(ish), light and quiet but with a fixed lens,
ponderous film change and little flexibility.
Which one? (Either can be adapted for TTL metering and prism or waist
finders and neither will be used in the studio much).
Craig
Washington, DC
---
Rollei List
- Post to rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'subscribe'
in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org
- Unsubscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with
'unsubscribe' in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org
- Online, searchable archives are available at
http://www.freelists.org/archives/rollei_list
- Follow-Ups:
- [rollei_list] Re: Okay -- SL66 vs. 2.8 TLR
- From: Mike Kovacs
- [rollei_list] Re: Okay -- SL66 vs. 2.8 TLR
- From: Richard Sintchak
- [rollei_list] Re: Okay -- SL66 vs. 2.8 TLR
- From: Allen Zak
- References:
- [rollei_list] rollei_list Digest subject lines.....c'mon people!
- From: Richard Sintchak
- [rollei_list] Digest subject lines.....c'mon people!
- From: Marc James Small
Other related posts:
- » [rollei_list] Okay -- SL66 vs. 2.8 TLR
- » [rollei_list] Re: Okay -- SL66 vs. 2.8 TLR
- » [rollei_list] Re: Okay -- SL66 vs. 2.8 TLR
- » [rollei_list] Re: Okay -- SL66 vs. 2.8 TLR
- » [rollei_list] Re: Okay -- SL66 vs. 2.8 TLR
- » [rollei_list] Re: Okay -- SL66 vs. 2.8 TLR
- » [rollei_list] Re: Okay -- SL66 vs. 2.8 TLR
- » [rollei_list] Re: Okay -- SL66 vs. 2.8 TLR
- » [rollei_list] Re: Okay -- SL66 vs. 2.8 TLR
- » [rollei_list] Re: Okay -- SL66 vs. 2.8 TLR
- » [rollei_list] Re: Okay -- SL66 vs. 2.8 TLR
- » [rollei_list] Re: Okay -- SL66 vs. 2.8 TLR
- » [rollei_list] Re: Okay -- SL66 vs. 2.8 TLR
- » [rollei_list] Re: Okay -- SL66 vs. 2.8 TLR
- » [rollei_list] Re: Okay -- SL66 vs. 2.8 TLR
- » [rollei_list] Re: Okay -- SL66 vs. 2.8 TLR
- » [rollei_list] Re: Okay -- SL66 vs. 2.8 TLR
- » [rollei_list] Re: Okay -- SL66 vs. 2.8 TLR
- » [rollei_list] Re: Okay -- SL66 vs. 2.8 TLR
- » [rollei_list] Re: Okay -- SL66 vs. 2.8 TLR
- » [rollei_list] Re: Okay -- SL66 vs. 2.8 TLR
- » [rollei_list] Re: Okay -- SL66 vs. 2.8 TLR
- » [rollei_list] Re: Okay -- SL66 vs. 2.8 TLR
- » [rollei_list] Re: Okay -- SL66 vs. 2.8 TLR
- » [rollei_list] Re: Okay -- SL66 vs. 2.8 TLR
- » [rollei_list] Re: Okay -- SL66 vs. 2.8 TLR
- » [rollei_list] Re: Okay -- SL66 vs. 2.8 TLR
- » [rollei_list] Re: Okay -- SL66 vs. 2.8 TLR
- » [rollei_list] Re: Okay -- SL66 vs. 2.8 TLR
--- Rollei List
- [rollei_list] Re: Okay -- SL66 vs. 2.8 TLR
- From: Mike Kovacs
- [rollei_list] Re: Okay -- SL66 vs. 2.8 TLR
- From: Richard Sintchak
- [rollei_list] Re: Okay -- SL66 vs. 2.8 TLR
- From: Allen Zak
- [rollei_list] rollei_list Digest subject lines.....c'mon people!
- From: Richard Sintchak
- [rollei_list] Digest subject lines.....c'mon people!
- From: Marc James Small