[rollei_list] Re: Digital printing v. Analog
- From: Richard Urmonas <rurmonas@xxxxxxxxxx>
- To: rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Sat, 16 Apr 2005 20:54:30 +0930
I fully agree. The first time this was brought home to me was when I
used the digital to shoot my neighbours grand-daughter's wedding
(fortunately as a guest). The veil looks like a patch of fog.
Absolutely no detail to show it is a fine mesh. Film shows it as a
veil.
Richard
On 16/04/2005, at 4:17 AM, Laurence Cuffe wrote:
> I think the area where its easiest to distinguish the results of
> digital from real film is textures, as the level of detail required to
> distinguish say silk from fine linen, or the surface of a birch leaf
> from the surface of a beach leaf is still a challenge for digital
> cameras.
>
Richard Urmonas
Other related posts:
