[rollei_list] Digital printing v. Analog
- From: "Peter K." <peterk727@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Thu, 14 Apr 2005 09:32:06 -0700
Austin,=20
I have seen many digital images. Done right, you could not tell the
difference between a quality digital image at 11x14 or one from a film
camera.
However, if you are comparing 4x6 or 5x7 prints done at a one-hour lab
with the terrible digital prints you get at your local Walgreens or
Wal-Mart, it is the printing that is bad and not the image from the
digital camera.
Peter K
On 4/14/05, Austin Franklin <austin@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Hi Ardeshir,
>=20
> > >> On the other hand, I have a couple of inexpensive P&S digital
> > >> cameras. They can take 256 or so exposures on a single card, each of
> > >> which will then be able to be printed to at least 20" by 24" without
> > >> any noticeable problem with quality.
> > >
> > > You're kidding, right? You'd barely be able to print a 4x6 from an
> > > "inexpensive P&S digital camera" without having "noticeable problems
> > > with quality". Unless your standards are very very low.
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > >
> > > Austin
> >
> > He IS kidding, Austin.
>=20
> Scary as it is, I think he's serious.
>=20
> Regards,
>=20
> Austin
>=20
>=20
--=20
Peter K
=D3=BF=D5=AC
Other related posts:
