Right now people have money before the holidays. The $750 is a fairly realistic price, but the camera has the less sought after Xenotar. Now I am not trying to get into a pissing contest with Planar versus Xenotar. They are both good lenses, but the Planar fetches the higher price. Personally for that money I would opt for a 2.8 lens. That is the ones the pros usually used and Bay 3 accessories seem to be more prevalent. Besides, I get a bit faster of a lens for those low light situations. Peter K On 12/4/05, Rei Shinozuka <shino@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > ebay rating is a function of transparency of information (condition, > return policy, shipping cost, etc) and efficient execution. it's > not an indicator of general price level, since > buyers are free to bid whatever they want for an object, or to not > enter into the transaction at all. > > in other words, i don't think it is legitimate for a buyer to > give a seller a negative rating because the price was too high, or > indeed to complain in general that the seller "charged too much". > > -rei > > On Dec03 21:37, Don Williams wrote: > > Interesting listing on eBay. A relatively clean 3.5F for around > $1,200. > > > > Item # 7568780673 > > > > Seems somewhat high to me but I suppose that the seller has been > having > > success or he wouldn't still be in business. > > -- > Rei Shinozuka shino@xxxxxxxxx > Ridgewood, New Jersey > > --- > Rollei List > > - Post to rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > > - Subscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'subscribe' > in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org > > - Unsubscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with > 'unsubscribe' in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org > > - Online, searchable archives are available at > //www.freelists.org/archives/rollei_list > > -- Peter K Ó¿Õ¬