[rodgersorgan] Re: The Timeline -
- From: Ian McLean <solo_tibia@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: rodgersorgan@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Fri, 25 Apr 2003 16:42:43 -0700 (PDT)
--- Charlie Strack <charlie_strack@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> That just has to be true! Rodgers has proven several
> times over (the 33E, =
> 34E, 36E, 320, 321, 322, 327, 333, 340, & 360 for stock
> models, to say =
> nothing of custom organs) that they can build a good
> theatre organ.
Thank you Charlie! The point that I was making in my
original post was that Rodgers *did* make TO's and has, in
its Timeline history of all that they have manufactured,
left *all* mention of the above out of their history. As if
they had never existed.
Why?
Ian McLean
__________________________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
The New Yahoo! Search - Faster. Easier. Bingo
http://search.yahoo.com
=============================================================================
New low pricing on books and music for the Rodgers Organ at www.frogmusic.com
=============================================================================
To unsubscribe or change mail delivery (digest, vacation)
go to www.frogmusic.com/rodgersmem.html
- References:
- [rodgersorgan] Re: The Timeline -
- From: Charlie Strack
Other related posts:
- » [rodgersorgan] The Timeline -
- » [rodgersorgan] Re: The Timeline -
- » [rodgersorgan] Re: The Timeline -
- » [rodgersorgan] Re: The Timeline -
- » [rodgersorgan] Re: The Timeline -
- [rodgersorgan] Re: The Timeline -
- From: Charlie Strack