[roc-chat] Re: Super Strypi

  • From: David Smith <davew6dps@xxxxxxxxx>
  • To: roc-chat@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Wed, 4 Nov 2015 14:37:31 -0800

Wait.

I thought the Kevlar was heresy, and nylon was orthodox.

;)

David P Smith
Tripoli 15803
NAR 78668
Amateur Extra: W6DPS
ROC Board Member
On Nov 4, 2015 2:30 PM, "Jim - TFJ" <jim@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

≫ And prefer tubular nylon shock cords...

Heretic.



Jim G.



*From:* roc-chat-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:
roc-chat-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] *On Behalf Of *David Smith
*Sent:* Wednesday, November 04, 2015 2:02 PM
*To:* roc-chat@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
*Subject:* [roc-chat] Re: Super Strypi



I always like to have my launch lugs free to spin.

And prefer tubular nylon shock cords...

David P Smith
Tripoli 15803
NAR 78668
Amateur Extra: W6DPS
ROC Board Member

On Nov 4, 2015 1:59 PM, <kramer@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

The first launch of the SuperStrypi rocket
http://spaceflightnow.com/2015/11/04/air-force-declares-failure-on-super-strypi-test-launch/
failed
early in the first stage burn. Not to speculate, but the rocket did use a
rail to launch. I'm thinking that they let the launch lugs spin instead of
having the fixed, this caused a gyroscopic progression combined with the
Corilolis effect caused flow separation at the lugs resulting in unbalanced
mach cone development resulting in asymmetrical buffeting on the fins
causing flight instability resulting in failure....



If they ONLY would have kept the launch lugs from spinning the failure
could have been prevented...





Mike (nylon or Kevlar) Kramer

-- ROC-Chat mailing list roc-chat@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
//www.freelists.org/list/roc-chat

Other related posts: