I don't know, we have seen some big rockets, even NASA ones, turn rather nimbly... However briefly. ;-) I don't consider it reasonable for a group to come out, turn the kids loose on the club, and say "Have fun!" What are some guidelines that we can produce for the groups that attend? Scouting Roundtables (A monthly, district wide meeting of adult leaders) would be a great place to help educate the Scouting leaders as to what would be expected when attending a launch, or how to hold their own launch. This could be conducted by a Scouting leader who is involved on rocketry, with some guidance by ROC as to flight line etiquette. Maybe call it ROCtiquette? Add some basic stuff, like don't throw defunct rockets and trash in to the porta potties!‼ The AV district holds our Roundtables on the second Tuesday, so there is still time to squeeze something in before Roctober. If you would like to discuss this further off-chat, or on chat for that matter... jim@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Jim G From: roc-chat-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:roc-chat-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of R Dierking Sent: Monday, August 25, 2014 8:36 AM To: roc-chat@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: [roc-chat] Re: Suggestions for ROC and youth groups Thank you Greg and the rest of our Board of Directors! Everyone should know that even when we disagree we are still all friends in this great hobby and always support each other. I don't want anyone to get the impression that we are not on the same team. Richard Dierking _____ From: lyzenga@xxxxxxxxx Subject: [roc-chat] Re: Suggestions for ROC and youth groups Date: Sun, 24 Aug 2014 16:41:02 -0700 To: roc-chat@xxxxxxxxxxxxx It’s good to see a spirited discussion going on regarding the future of the club. It means that people care, and I’m all for that! As the president of the club (at least for a little while longer), I figured it might be a good idea for me to speak up just a little, lest anyone out there think the board is disengaged from this issue or is rigidly fixed on some particular agenda. We think it is quite important that our members understand what issues the BOD is actively discussing, debating and thinking about. While we don’t necessarily agree on every detail, the BOD collectively thinks it would be unwise to change any major operating characteristics of the club without careful deliberation, ample feedback and plenty of advance notice of any changes. That alone limits the scope of changes we can implement as soon as this coming October. It takes at least a few months for any major changes to occur, given that we only have the chance to talk and interact as a board a couple times a month. However in light of that fact, we can outline some basic principles that we think have served the club well and we will strive to follow. The ROC BOD is not considering fundamental changes to our club’s founding principle of supporting LPR, MPR and HPR activities equally (whatever “equally means!). For many of us, LPR has served as the gateway to high power activities, and the intermediate MPR level is a crucial training ground for those flyers of all ages who are increasing the power of their flights. Now what the BOD *IS* considering is how we can effectively handle large launches in which the preponderance of participants are not experienced in rocketry. Our first consideration always has to be safety, and with limited volunteer resources we have to make sure that the demand for our launches is proportionately matched to the available help. This discussion is definitely not about scouts versus other groups, or about LPR versus HPR, or even about ROCtober versus regular launches. It distracts the discussion away from constructive dialog to frame it in terms of “us versus them” type conflicts, and we don’t as a board consider it productive to engage in divisive either-or debates. So let’s keep the good ideas coming and we’ll all try to come down on the side of being constructive. And it helps to remember that the BOD usually can’t turn on a dime… it’s a big old Saturn V we’re trying to steer and it takes a while after you gimbal those engines to see a change in course. Thanks for your understanding and ideas! Greg Lyzenga ROC President - NAR #13295 / Tripoli #12088