[ringzero] Re: (OT) Apache Named Virtual Hosting question

  • From: Robert C Wittig <wittig.robert@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: ringzero@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Sat, 03 Feb 2007 10:14:08 -0600

Godwin Stewart wrote:

> Take a look at the headers of this mail. You'll see that every header
> makes sense because my mailer and the chain of MTAs between here and
> the outside world all make sense.
> 
> First header:
> 
> Received: from dragonfly.bonivet.net (localhost [127.0.0.1])
>       by dragonfly.bonivet.net (8.13.6/8.13.6) with SMTP id l13DFrgu008277
>       for <ringzero@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Sat, 3 Feb 2007 13:15:53 GMT
> 
> My mailer identifies itself to the copy of sendmail running on my
> workstation as "dragonfly.bonivet.net". sendmail itself sees the
> connection from 127.0.0.1 as coming from "localhost" (which is pretty
> much to be expected). The local MTA (sendmail 8.13.6) knows that it's
> running on a machine called "dragonfly.bonivet.net".
> 

I ran the whois on bonivet.net, and of course, it is you.

Is dragonfly.bonivet.net the actual machine on which you host your 
website, or what? I tried accessing http://dragonfly.bonivet.net and 
http://www.bonivet.net and got a 'Forbidden', so I am guessing, 'not'.

This is something that I do not understand...

I own 3 domains, robertwittig.com, .net and .org. At the moment, dot-com 
resolves to 70.142.248.60 ...machine name: compaq.robertwittig.com, and 
dot-net and dot-org resolve to 70.142.248.61 ...machine name 
supermicro.robertwittig.net.

These two machines are OpenBSD servers, not Desktop machines.

I also have one other BSD machine set up as a practice server, using 
70.142.248.59, but I only turn it on when I am working on it, figuring 
things out, like PF firewall rules. I arbitrarily named the machine 
practice.robertwittig.org, but I never pointed the robertwittig.org 
domain name at it... I just ran it as a bare IP address.

My Red Hat desktop only had one entry in it...

127.0.0.1       localhost.localdomain   localhost

...and later, I added...

192.168.0.109   wavemaster.localdomain  wavemaster
192.168.0.108   franblue.localdomain    fran-blue-msi

...so that the Red Hat machine would recognise those two Windows 2000 
Desktop machines, on the LAN.

So, what I don't understand, is how should a strictly Desktop machine, 
that does not have a web server running on it, and has only localhost 
sendmail running, and which share a single static IP address on the DSL 
modem/router with any an all other non-server Desktop machines (through 
the magic of NAT)... be named?

I put a lot of various machines temporarily on my LAN, because I build 
and repair for clients... mostly Windows boxes, running XP, which have, 
as far as I know, no FQDN whatsoever. When those Windows boxes go back 
to their owners, being generic Windows XP Desktop machines, how will 
their email headers look?

I don't want to take up too much of your time, so if this conversation 
is going farther than you care to pursue it, no problem, but if you 
don't mind explaining any of this, or pointing me to a URL that might be 
useful to me, I would be grateful.

I like doing things as right as I can, and also, understanding how they 
work, as well.


-- 
-wittig http://www.robertwittig.com/
.       http://robertwittig.net/

-- 
You are receiving this message as part of your subscription to the
"ringzero" mailing list at freelists.org. To unsubscribe, send an e-mail
to ringzero-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe

Other related posts: