[real-eyes] Re: blind podcasts

does the pocket plextalk record in .mp3, .wav, or .wma formats, or is it 
primarily daisy

-----Original Message----- 
From: Reginald George
Sent: Sunday, July 01, 2012 1:29 AM
To: real-eyes@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [real-eyes] Re: blind podcasts

The plextalk has much more fantastic recording capabilities.  It will record
in stereo up to CD quality, and you can actually do some edits of the
recordings you make internally.  It also uses better voices for reading text
material and will also play the NLS books.  It also has capability to
connect directly to a wireless network and play podcasts and online radio
stations.

-----Original Message----- 
From: Margaret Condy
Sent: Saturday, June 30, 2012 3:36 PM
To: real-eyes@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [real-eyes] Re: blind podcasts

Why do you wish you had gone for the PlexTalk instead of the BookSense?
I have a BookSense and I'm not thrilled with it, but I thought that the
Victor Stream was its direct competitor, not the PlexTalk.

Margaret, who reads all these postings but almost never comments.

On 30-Jun-2012 12:16 PM, Mitchell D. Lynn wrote:
> Did the BookSense and wish I had gone for the PlexTalk.
>
> I've looked at the Book Share stuff. Does have a lot of good reads there,
> but don't want to mess with the membership/subscription fees. Translated,
> that means there are still unpossessed Mozart recordings with my name on
> them. And I prefer human readers whenever possible.
>
>

To subscribe or to leave the list, or to set other subscription options, go
to www.freelists.org/list/real-eyes

To subscribe or to leave the list, or to set other subscription options, go 
to www.freelists.org/list/real-eyes


To subscribe or to leave the list, or to set other subscription options, go to 
www.freelists.org/list/real-eyes


Other related posts: