[ratpack] Re: Photoshop and printers...

  • From: PAUL W WATSON <tswatson78@xxxxxxx>
  • To: ratpack <ratpack@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Fri, 16 Sep 2011 08:21:25 -0700

Dr. Z.
 
Everything Ray, Big Al and Richard said is all Greek to me.  I told you I was 
the Photoshop idiot.
 
P
 



Subject: [ratpack] Re: Photoshop and printers...
From: muttley128@xxxxxxxxxxx
Date: Fri, 16 Sep 2011 07:37:43 -0600
To: ratpack@xxxxxxxxxxxxx


Bicubic enlargement 110 percent at a time will blow it up larger with pretty 
good results.  Better than just changing the size or you can get a program 
called genuine fractals and blow it up extremely large with good results. 
Hopefully It does not have jpeg artifacts. (blocks). 5 megapixels should give 
you enough to get a print out of it. 

Sent from my iPhone

On Sep 15, 2011, at 9:59 PM, Michael Wells <mcwellsphoto@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:




Aleta,

Here's one of the originals, let me see what you can do, this of course is just 
a copy so go crazy.

Dr Z


On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 9:33 PM, Aleta Boyce <alboyce@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:


ok, I finally backtracked all the message and I think I've caught up with the 
PHotoshop conversation - sorry, but I've been gone for a few days.
Most printers will only print at about 150 dpi - any more than that is probably 
a waste unless you have a pretty high-end printer.  Also, you want to check the 
saturation and levels if you have photoshop - 
You don't want the levels of black or white to start just anywhere; they need 
to start at the very edges of your graph, if possible, to get the best blacks 
especially.
If it's printing all grainy it could be the resolution is too low - 72 is too 
low - so when you take it to photoshop or any good viewer you should be able to 
check the maximum size and resolution and make adjustments, but if you can't, 
send it on and I'll be glad to do it and/or walk you through it by email.  
If no one else wants to see that conversation I can send it direct.


Also, every monitor is different, so it may look great on a monitor and crappy 
in print.  That's normal - you have to calibrate (which might help) and adjust 
prints to the paper and printer you're using.  The printer settings are at 
least half the battle.


Did I rave on too much?  I never know...
al



-- 
Dr. Z
aka Michael Wells
MCWells Photography
mcwellsphoto@xxxxxxxxx
801-850-7279


<IMG_0478.jpg>                                    

Other related posts: