[pure-silver] Re: update: verichrome pan dev time
- From: Jean-David Beyer <jeandavid8@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: pure-silver@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Sat, 01 Nov 2014 13:45:39 -0400
On 11/01/2014 12:09 PM, Richard Knoppow wrote:
>
> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Tim Daneliuk" <tundra@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> To: <pure-silver@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Friday, October 31, 2014 1:37 PM
> Subject: [pure-silver] Re: update: verichrome pan dev time
>> If only there were a reliable source of frozen Plus-X in 4x5 and 120. It
>> was a worthy competitor to my beloved APX 100.
>>
> If you have a sample you can tell from the perforations. Plus-X still
> film has Kodak Standard perfs (oblong) and Plus-X motion picture
> negative has Bell & Howell perfs (round sides).
>
Plus-X film in 35mm format was a pretty good film. But 4147 Plus-X in
sheet sizes was so different it should have had a different name
altogether. It was all toe, and the way I use film, I hate that as it
lowers the shadow contrast way too much for my taste. I really liked the
TMX film and TMY as they had shorter toes. But some people had a lot of
trouble with short-toe films.
YMMV.
--
.~. Jean-David Beyer Registered Linux User 85642.
/V\ PGP-Key:166D840A 0C610C8B Registered Machine 1935521.
/( )\ Shrewsbury, New Jersey http://linuxcounter.net
^^-^^ 13:40:01 up 1 day, 16 min, 2 users, load average: 4.23, 4.29, 4.18
=============================================================================================================
To unsubscribe from this list, go to www.freelists.org and logon to your
account (the same e-mail address and password you set-up when you subscribed,)
and unsubscribe from there.
Other related posts:
