[pure-silver] Re: numbering prints?
- From: "Tim Rudman" <tim@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <pure-silver@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 15 Sep 2006 20:17:13 +0100
I have been very persuaded by Brooks Jensen's (of Lens Work) article 'What
size is the edition?'
I can't find a link to it and I think I can't post it here as an attachment.
Does anyone have the link?
If not I can forward an attachment privately
Tim
http://www.worldoflithprinting.com
-----Original Message-----
From: pure-silver-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:pure-silver-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Shannon Stoney
Sent: 15 September 2006 19:25
To: pure-silver@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [pure-silver] numbering prints?
Hi, I went to a talk last night at Houston Center for Photography, and one
issue that was discussed was the issue of numbering photographic prints as
an edition, as one would do with intaglio or lithographic prints.
I do number my photogravures because they are made in the printmaking
tradition of having a plate and making an edition. But sometimes I resent
the fact that I'm not supposed to make any more prints with these perfectly
fine plates. You are even supposed to limit the number of artist's proofs
you make these days it seems!
But I have never numbered my photographs as an edition. I just figured they
were all "open editions." But somebody said that this is not a good idea if
you are selling prints through a gallery.
Indeed, my partner and I were at the Texas gallery over the weekend, which
has a show of photographs of a surrealist garden in Mexico, and there were
some huge, very expensive prints by Sally Mann, in an edition of only 5! Of
course most of us will never be like Sally Mann in that our photographs will
never be worth $50,000 a piece, but it seems that often in galleries prints
ARE numbered as a limited edition.
I found out recently that the idea of numbering even intaglio prints is
fairly recent. Rembrandt just printed until the plate wore out.
I'm not sure when the idea of editions took hold, but I think it was in the
18th or 19th century, and the idea was to make prints more valuable. But I
kind of like the idea that prints are cheap and affordable.
So, just wondering: do you number your prints? Do you make "editions"? Or
do you just print what you want, when you want? Has anybody ever demanded
that you make an edition, in order to make the prints more valuable, say, a
gallery owner?
I guess they are business people too, and it's in their interest to make
your prints seem more valuable.
--shannon
============================================================================
=================================
To unsubscribe from this list, go to www.freelists.org and logon to your
account (the same e-mail address and password you set-up when you
subscribed,) and unsubscribe from there.
=============================================================================================================
To unsubscribe from this list, go to www.freelists.org and logon to your
account (the same e-mail address and password you set-up when you subscribed,)
and unsubscribe from there.
Other related posts:
