[pure-silver] Re: moonlighting
- From: Bill Stephenson <photographica@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: pure-silver@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Sat, 9 Oct 2004 03:42:35 -0400
Seems to me that a "trailed" crescent might well show as a near-sphere,
especially since it's overexposed and the flare would add to the
roundness. I don't see any fakery here.
-Bill
On Friday, October 8, 2004, at 05:52 PM, john frost wrote:
> Kent is right. An exposure long enough to trail the stars would have
> trailed the moon. And quarter moon *is* cresent. Good job catching that
> error, Kent. I been doing astronomy for 40 years and it went right over
> the top of my head, which is purty low now......
>
> john (:>)))
>
> Jim Brick wrote:
>
>> At 07:18 AM 10/8/2004, Garry D. Lewis wrote:
>>
>>
>>> No details of how it was made, but I do admit it IS a cool picture--
>>>
>>> http://antwrp.gsfc.nasa.gov/apod/ap041007.html
>>
>>
>>
>> ???
>>
>> Directly below the photograph is a complete and clear explanation...
>>
>> :-)
>>
>> Jim
>>
>> ======================================================================
>> =======================================
>> To unsubscribe from this list, go to www.freelists.org and logon to
>> your account (the same e-mail address and password you set-up when
>> you subscribed,) and unsubscribe from there.
>>
>
> =======================================================================
> ======================================
> To unsubscribe from this list, go to www.freelists.org and logon to
> your account (the same e-mail address and password you set-up when you
> subscribed,) and unsubscribe from there.
>
=============================================================================================================
To unsubscribe from this list, go to www.freelists.org and logon to your
account (the same e-mail address and password you set-up when you subscribed,)
and unsubscribe from there.
Other related posts:
