[pure-silver] Re: moonlighting
- From: john frost <johnfrost@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: pure-silver@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Fri, 08 Oct 2004 14:52:50 -0700
Kent is right. An exposure long enough to trail the stars would have
trailed the moon. And quarter moon *is* cresent. Good job catching that
error, Kent. I been doing astronomy for 40 years and it went right over
the top of my head, which is purty low now......
john (:>)))
Jim Brick wrote:
> At 07:18 AM 10/8/2004, Garry D. Lewis wrote:
>
>
>>No details of how it was made, but I do admit it IS a cool picture--
>>
>>http://antwrp.gsfc.nasa.gov/apod/ap041007.html
>
>
>
> ???
>
> Directly below the photograph is a complete and clear explanation...
>
> :-)
>
> Jim
>
> =============================================================================================================
> To unsubscribe from this list, go to www.freelists.org and logon to your
> account (the same e-mail address and password you set-up when you
> subscribed,) and unsubscribe from there.
>
=============================================================================================================
To unsubscribe from this list, go to www.freelists.org and logon to your
account (the same e-mail address and password you set-up when you subscribed,)
and unsubscribe from there.
Other related posts:
