[pure-silver] Re: ddx vs d76

  • From: "Richard Knoppow" <dickburk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: <pure-silver@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Fri, 11 Feb 2005 15:15:08 -0800

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "titrisol" <titrisol@xxxxxxxxx>
To: <pure-silver@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Friday, February 11, 2005 2:17 PM
Subject: [pure-silver] Re: ddx vs d76


>I thought ID-11 was the phenidone D76
\

   ID 11 is the original D-76 formula. Current pacaged D-76 
is approximately the buffered formula published as D-76d.
   A comparison of the ingredients of DDX and Microphen show 
them to be very similar except for the stuff put into DDX to 
keep the ingredients in solution. Both are 
Phenidone-Hydroquinone developers with a Borax-Boric acid 
buffer. Potassium sulfite is used because it probably can 
make a more concentrated solution than the sodium salt. 
Dielethylene glycol is a solvent. There is also a 
sequestering agent for magnesium and calcium salts in the 
water. It may also help keep things in solution.
   Since the MSDS is for the concentrate the pH will be for 
that. I have no idea what happens to the pH when the 
concentrate is diluted but, since the solution appears to be 
well buffered, perhaps not much.
   Microphen is a packaged version of Ilford ID-68

Water, at 125F or 52C                        750.0 ml
Sodium Sulfite, dessicated                    85.0 grams
Hydroquinone                                   5.0 grams
Borax                                          7.0 grams
Boric Acid                                     2.0 grams
Potassium Bromide                              1.0 gram
Phenidone                                      0.13 gram
Water to make                                  1.0 liter

Copying from Gerald Koch's post the MSDS for DDX is:


Ingredient                    CAS #         Weight
----------------------------------------------------
Diethyleneglycol ............   111-46-6 ..  5 - 10%
Hydroquinone ................   123-31-9 ..  1 - 5%
Phenidone-B ................. 13047-13-7 ..  0 - 1%
Boric acid .................. 10043-35-3 ..  1 - 5%
DTPA Na5 ....................    67-43-6 ..  1 - 5%
Potassium sulfite ........... 10117-38-1 .. 30 - 60%
Sodium tetraborate ..........  1330-43-4 ..  1 - 5%
Water ..................................... 30 - 60%



For reference the buffered version of D-76 is:

D-76d
Water, at 125F or 52C                        750.0 ml
Metol                                          2.0 grams
Sodium Sulfite, dessicated                   100.0 grams
Hydroquinone                                   5.0 grams
Borax, decahydrated                            8.0 grams
Boric Acid, crystaline                         8.0 grams
Water to make                                  1.0 liter

   The original D-76 and the published formula for ID-11 
are:

Water, at 125F or 52C                        750.0 ml
Metol                                          2.0 grams
Sodium Sulfite, dessicated                   100.0 grams
Hydroquinone                                   5.0 grams
Borax, decahydrated                            2.0 grams
Water to make                                  1.0 liter

A version which is closer to being "optimum" according to 
Ryuji Suzuki is:

Agfa/Ansco 17

Water, at 125F or 52C                        750.0 ml
Metol                                          1.5 grams
Sodium Sulfite, dessicated                    80.0 grams
Hydroquinone                                    3.0 grams
Borax, granular                                 3.0 grams
Potassium Bromide                               0.5 gram
Water to make                                   1.0 liter

   Note that the reduced sulfite shows up in the Microphen 
formula.
   In their 1929 paper exploring variations of D-76 Carlton 
and Crabtree, of Kodak Labs, found that the addition of 0.5 
gram of bromide per liter increased film speed slightly due 
to suppression of a small amount of developer fog which is 
typical of D-76 type formulas when used _for the first 
time_. The buffered formula is also in this paper and is 
offered as a cure for the slow rise in activity of D-76 type 
developers when not buffered. The cause was not known at the 
time but is now thought to be a slow reaction between the 
hydroquinone and sulfite which generates some hydroxide 
causing a slow rise in pH.

---
Richard Knoppow
Los Angeles, CA, USA
dickburk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx

=============================================================================================================
To unsubscribe from this list, go to www.freelists.org and logon to your 
account (the same e-mail address and password you set-up when you subscribed,) 
and unsubscribe from there.

Other related posts: