----- Original Message ----- From: "Michael Briggs" <MichaelBriggs@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> To: <pure-silver@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Sent: Friday, February 11, 2005 8:29 PM Subject: [pure-silver] Microphen and possible formulas > > On 11-Feb-2005 Ryuji Suzuki wrote: >>> Microphen is a packaged version of Ilford ID-68 >> >> As far as I know they are different developers. >> Microphen is said to be same as an unnumbered Ilfored >> formula >> developed for repenished deep tank use. >> > > Some have guessed ID-68 to essentially be Microphen, and > others have guessed > the Ilford Replenishing Developer. Perhaps both guesses > are just as > accurate, the formulas have strong similarities. The > best test would be to > mix all three and develop some film. > > ID-68 IRD > sodium sulfite 85 g 100 g > hydroquinone 5 g 5 g > borax 7 g 3 g > boric acid 2 g 3.5 g > phenidone 0.13 g 0.2 g > potasium bromide 1 g 1 g > water to make 1 liter 1 liter > target pH ? 8.95 > > The formula for Ilford Replenishing Developer is from page > 112 of The Film > Developing Cookbook. Also given are two replenishers for > this developer, one > for topping up and the other for a bleed system. > > --Michael > There is a replenisher formula for ID-68. More modern developers, like Xtol and T-Max RS are both developer and replenisher. For continuous machine use there is often a developer starter or developer conditioner as used for color developers. This is to insure consistent results from the start. FWIW, here is the formula for ID-68 replenisher. Ilford ID-68R Water, at 125F or 52C 750.0 ml Sodium Sulfite, dessicated 85.0 grams Hydroquinone 8.0 grams Borax 7.0 grams Phenidone 0.22 grams Water to make 1.0 liter Ilford's instructions are to add this to the tank to maintain the level. This is a crude way of replenishing that does not insure consistency. I think it would be useful to test all three developers but my guess is that there probably isn't a whole lot of difference. IRD has much more Phenidone but is buffered to a lower pH (ID-68 has more Borax and less boric acid). I think the pH in all of these is too low for Hydroquinone to be active as a developing agent as is the case with D-76. --- Richard Knoppow Los Angeles, CA, USA dickburk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx ============================================================================================================= To unsubscribe from this list, go to www.freelists.org and logon to your account (the same e-mail address and password you set-up when you subscribed,) and unsubscribe from there.