Sorry Bill, you're right. It was your post, which got us talking and Chris tried it. Indeed, it works remarkably well. Regards Ralph W. Lambrecht http://www.darkroomagic.com On 2006-04-18 23:00, "BILL WILLIAMS" <krbill_10@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Christopher, > > In an earlier post re:digital negatives, I too pointed > out that you can make acceptable film negatives using > the format of your choice, and photographing an inkjet > positive. > > From my earlier post: "the point I was > making was that you can use Photoshop to print a > positive image, color or b&w, and do all the > retouching and curve altering you would do to produce > an inkjet negative. I have an Ansco(maybe a 1930 > build)5x7. I've used it, and smaller formats to copy > inkjet printed positive images, resulting in negatives > suitable for contact prints OR enlarging. I don't > have to worry about the ink smudging on my negative > since it is on silver film. Now, I know that's not > what everyone else is doing, but it works similar, and > if I had an 8x10 camera, or a 16x20 camera as a friend > does, I could make larger film negatives for > alternative or contact prints." > > The fact is that it works well. > > > __________________________________________________ > Do You Yahoo!? > Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around > http://mail.yahoo.com > ============================================================================== > =============================== > To unsubscribe from this list, go to www.freelists.org and logon to your > account (the same e-mail address and password you set-up when you subscribed,) > and unsubscribe from there. ============================================================================================================= To unsubscribe from this list, go to www.freelists.org and logon to your account (the same e-mail address and password you set-up when you subscribed,) and unsubscribe from there.