Christopher Woodhouse a écrit :
This is something I did years ago (pre-Photoshop era) with several pictures mixed together with airbrush (art)work (I could not put reasonably the prefix "art" ...).Tim, I think there is a simpler way. It produces better results than any inkjet negative. Ralph agrees.
You simply photograph a 12x16 inkjet print and print the negative :)
1) If the image has a resolution 600dpi any competent inkjet printer will give you about 9 lp/mm on paper. 2) A 4x5 negative copy, taken with a standard lens and printed at 12x16 still has a resolution of 7lp/mm on paper (Nikon 150, f11, TriX)
Now here is the clever bit. Use a smooth matt paper. It avoids all the issues of lighting reflections and so on. In fact, diffuse lighting works better with matt originals.
You also need to adjust the print tonality for the negative / photo paper process. I did this very simply:
Make a simple stepwedge in 5%K increments and print it on an inkjet printer, using whatever method you use to produce accurate prints.
Stick the print to the wall and take an incident light reading. Use the film's ISO value and add a stop of exposure for good measure. Copy the picture, using medium or large format (I think 35mm is chancing it) and develop it at N+1. This gives a negative which will print full range at grade 2. Make a print of the stepwedge, adjusting contrast and exposure to get a full range of tones. Compare this print with the inkjet print and make a conversion table for equal print densities. (You can do this more accurately with a densitometer). This table becomes a saved photoshop curve.
When you want to make a negative, you first make a proof print on the inkjet printer and satisfy yourself it is OK, then print it again at 12x16 or similar, after applying the Photoshop curve. The print will look a little weird, but when you photograph it and reprint it, will resemble the proof print, providing you stick to the same exposure, development and printing conditions.
If the print head is aligned properly (and there are no striations in the inkjet print), you will only see film grain in the final print, with smooth gradation in highlight and shadow tones. I had success first time with this approach and want to sell my shares in Pictorico.
Chris Woodhouse
Funny from a technical point of view, disastrous from an artistic one ...
-- Claudio Bonavolta http://www.bonavolta.ch
============================================================================================================= To unsubscribe from this list, go to www.freelists.org and logon to your account (the same e-mail address and password you set-up when you subscribed,) and unsubscribe from there.