----- Original Message ----- From: "Michael A. Smith and Paula Chamlee" <michaelandpaula@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <pure-silver@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Sent: Wednesday, May 20, 2009 3:53 PMSubject: [pure-silver] Re: AZO and Benzotriazole for anti-fogging
Hello Bogdan, This is the first mention of Azo since I have been back on this list, so I will chime in. There will be no fogging on the Azo. If you have read my articles on Azo (all at http://www.michaleandpaula.com) you will see that Azo that has been stored in hot conditions has been perfect after thirty years. We now print on Azo from the 1970s (and occasionally Azo from the 1940s). It is fine, except that it has lost a little contrast. I do not recommend Benzotriazole at all. It causes an ugly blue color. use KBr instead. Also, Dektol gives an unpleasant tone as well. Amidol gives the finest results. The formula I recommend is in my articles. Today, I add 50% more KBr, but otherwise, the formula works best as printed. Feel free to ask any questions. Michael A. SmithI think Azo is long lived partly because it is slow and perhaps also because it contains something to stop the ripening process from contining. For some reason developers like Dektol/D-72 cause a slightly olive color on some papers including Azo. Benzotriazole tends toward a blue image. Amidol is quite neutral. The amount of Kbr given in most developer formulas is the minimum for fog suppression and often considerably more can be added. The advantage of Benzotriazole over Kbr is that it tends to reduce speed less for a given amount of fog suppression although any anti-fogging agent is going to reduce speed.
-- Richard Knoppow Los Angeles, CA, USAdickburk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
============================================================================================================= To unsubscribe from this list, go to www.freelists.org and logon to your account (the same e-mail address and password you set-up when you subscribed,) and unsubscribe from there.