Rein, Your point about this test version not being compatible with the mainstream Fldigi is correct. This was not the intent. The RSID numbers are not wrong, they are simply not separate enough from other codes not to interfere. This will only be corrected in the release version. So for example the slow psk modes (psk31 and psk63) will decode as PSRK modes. But it will work with the speeds above 63 which is what we use for Pskmail. Regarding the Multipsk compatibility, the "Robust" modes (PSKXXXR) are NOT compatible as I have an interleaver while the PSK63F version does not. I am moving in the following direction at present: only implement PSK125R, PSK250R and PSK500R, plus, if Dave is happy with that, add PSK63F for compatibility with Multipsk. The logic being that PSK63R would be too slow for PSKMail application (psk31 data speed), so to avoid a plethora of modes with little utilisation I think these three robust modes will be enough. The difference between the "F" modes and the "R" mode is the addition of an interleaver for the "R" modes. Comments welcomed. Regarding the THOR mode issue that is my fault as I left some test code in there. I will send you the rectified version. This is the reason why I am now going through the Fldigi development system to avoid these kinds of embarrassing "backward steps", even if it is a test version. Regards, John (VK2ETA) On Sun, Dec 13, 2009 at 8:09 PM, Rein Couperus <rein@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > OK, sorry.... I fixed the permissons (chmod 644 fldigi-3.13_PSKR. tar.gz). > > BTW.: this fldigi version is extremely ALPHA, the THOR modes don't decode > properly > and the RSID numbers are WRONG, so this version is not compatible with main > stream versions.... But you can test the new PSKR modes, which are compatible > to > MultiPSK. > > Rein > >> Tells me I don't have permission to access only the fldigi file! >> >> >> -- >> Larry Levesque >> KA1VGM >> >> > > -- > http://pa0r.blogspirit.com > >