[projectaon] Re: My reading of 23mh
- From: Simon Osborne <outspaced@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: projectaon@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Thu, 15 Oct 2009 10:47:32 +0100
On 14/10/2009 18:46, Jonathan Blake wrote:
Perhaps, something along the lines of: "The reason that the Prince is
unarmed remains unexplained. He is armed in Section 170, and no
explicit statement since then explains why he has lost or forsaken his
short sword."
Sounds good to me. Updated the xml and the online editions:
<http://www.projectaon.org/test/en/xhtml/lw/23mh/title.htm>
We're pretty much good to go, unless anyone else has spotted anything? Best to post any issues now
(or before the weekend, at least).
--
Simon Osborne
Project Aon
~~~~~~
Manage your subscription at //www.freelists.org/list/projectaon
Other related posts:
