RE: Toad
- From: Rodney Haynie <RodneyH@xxxxxxxxxx>
- To: "programmingblind@xxxxxxxxxxxxx" <programmingblind@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 7 Apr 2009 11:02:03 -0400
I'll have to chime in here and agree that Toad is not very accessible at all.
I tried going through the company as well, to no avail.
Please consider the environment before printing this email.
From: programmingblind-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:programmingblind-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Adrian Beech
Sent: Tuesday, April 07, 2009 3:50 AM
To: programmingblind@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: RE: Toad
In the language of the frog it croaks big time. Forget the accessibility angle
when using JAWS. Based on the experience I had with the company they aint too
interested in making it thus.
From: programmingblind-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:programmingblind-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Homme, James
Sent: Monday, 6 April 2009 10:45 PM
To: programmingblind@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Toad
Hi,
A friend who is not a list member asked me how well JAWS works with a program
called Toad, which is used for SQL development. Does anyone here have
experience they want to share about this?
Thanks.
Jim
----------
Jim Homme, Usability Engineering.
412-544-1810.
Catch the gratitude attitude.
________________________________
This e-mail and any attachments to it are confidential and are intended solely
for use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have
received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately and then
delete it. If you are not the intended recipient, you must not keep, use,
disclose, copy or distribute this e-mail without the author's prior permission.
The views expressed in this e-mail message do not necessarily represent the
views of Highmark Inc., its subsidiaries, or affiliates.
__________ NOD32 3991 (20090407) Information __________
This message was checked by NOD32 antivirus system.
http://www.eset.com
Other related posts:
