I am behind you completely in this, a bad person, or one you disagree with does not effect the product, just your interaction with that person!
its the same principle I apply to my music, I like the songs "I'm bad", and"thriller", I hate Jackson for what he is, but that doesn't make a difference in the songs, and I refuse to let what I find out about the singer, effect my future enjoyment of the songs!
regards, inthane proprietor, The Grab Bag, for blind computer users and programmers http://grabbag.alacorncomputer.com Owner: Alacorn Computer Enterprises "own the might and majesty of a Alacorn!" www.alacorncomputer.com Owner: Agemtree "merchants in fine facetted and cabochon gemstones" www.agemtree.comoperator: Fruit Basket Demo Sight, where you can find a similar project done in several programming languages, along with its source code, so you can decide what language is right for you
http://fruitbasketdemo.alacorncomputer.com----- Original Message ----- From: "Chris Hofstader" <cdh@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <programmingblind@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Sent: Thursday, October 02, 2008 9:19 AM Subject: RE: Seeking perspectives on a computer purchasing predicament
I know Mike pretty well and, without questioning your veracity, this doesn'tsound like how I've grown accustom to seeing him behave regarding elders.In fact, I believe that the state of New Mexico did a big roll out to bringSystem Access to elders throughout their system and that Mike was an integral part of making the project happen. Also, while any of us may find Lee Hamilton or Mike Calvo or Doug Geoffray or Gil Papin or whomever else entirely distasteful, we should remember not to throw the proverbial baby out with the bathwater. Finding accesstechnology solutions that work for ourselves and those around us at what weperceive as a fair cost is hard enough without eliminating some entries based on personalities. I can't say I especially find Bill Gates or SteveJobs to be nice people but I use a lot of stuff from their companies anyway.cdh Chris Hofstader CUNY, BSO, ATG, Odds and Ends email: cdh@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Blog: http://www.blindconfidential.blogspot.com Skype: BlindChristian phone: 727-896-6393 -----Original Message----- From: programmingblind-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:programmingblind-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Bryan Schulz Sent: Thursday, October 02, 2008 12:02 PM To: programmingblind@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: Re: Seeking perspectives on a computer purchasing predicament hi, regardless of what you say about system access, i will never use it due to how ignorant mr. kalvo was to one of our elderly members at a convention. he had the attitude that she couldn't use a computer at her age and she should have to forfeit the door prize. Bryan Schulz The BEST Solution www.best-acts.com----- Original Message ----- From: "Chris Hofstader" <cdh@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>To: <programmingblind@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Sent: Thursday, October 02, 2008 9:19 AM Subject: RE: Seeking perspectives on a computer purchasing predicamentHey J, I've been running JAWS 9.xx.xxx on a 64 bit Core Two HP with 32 bit Vista loaded for about a year and a half. I haven't installed JAWS 10.xx on anything yet so cannot comment on it.My Vista box and JAWS get along relatively well and I find that, exceptingmany applications which JAWS 9 does not support adequately, the system works acceptably. I also find that having System Access around (I guess everyone has the "to go" version at their fingertips) is helpful as Monster Matt has made some very useful Vista things work really well with SA that are highly problematic with JAWS. On some specifics: JAWS 9 does great with IE, VisualStudio (using the scripts developed on this list) and a reasonably adequate job with Office 2007 and other programs I find useful. It is useless in the Vista voice recognition system (SA kicks ass) and most of the multi-media stuff that you might enjoy using to turn your new PC into a DVR or for downloading and playing movies from bit torrent and other sites. Office 2007 works reasonably well with both JAWS and SA on Vista and is not a 64 bit program but, like all Intel processors from 386 on forward, it can "step down" and run programs designed for earlier generation chips. I doubt Vista supports any 16 bit Windows programs but most Win32 applications should still work. The 32 bit Vista builds can only address 3.5 gb of memory with SP1, previously, it could only address 2 gb so this is an improvement. Of course, the four gb in my HP has been partially unused since I got the thing.I haven't done much more than fiddle around with Window-Eyes 6.xx on Vistaand it worked pretty good. I wrote a bunch of blog entries last summer comparing and contrasting JAWS, WE and SA as they were then with Vista which might be of some value to you if you go to BC and search the blog on related terms. If SA and WE are at all like JAWS internally, it will probably be quite some time until any of them start supporting the 64 bit architecture. There arelikely assumptions all over the place about the size of different elements being 32 bits and not 64. Porting from one to another, in a modern, cleancode base will be less hard than an older one that has been hacked and repaired many times over the years as is the case with JAWS and, I'll assume parts of WE as well. SA has a very new code base and a whole lot less code to port so Monster Matt may be able to do it in relatively short order. I'd also guess that the NVDA guys (I haven't looked at their source with thisproblem in mind), because they are based almost entirely on documented APIand not too much if at all on hooking hacks, may be able to take the jump more easily than the others. I find it discouraging in general that no current Windows screen reader supports the off-the-shelf PCs available at the consumer electronics stores anymore. When I worked at FS, we would often talk about trying to make sure JAWS would "work with the PC that will show up under the Christmas tree..." in any given year. More often than not, we made it (we were late with a default copy protection scheme that didn't require a floppy drive) but this year, it appears as if the only 64 bit screen readers will be Orca and VoiceOver and nothing (as far as I can tell) for Windows. Regarding price and performance for a standard use PC with screen reader, I think we're starting to hit a wall of diminishing returns. Lots of the extra horsepower and memory is great for multi-media stuff and really serious number and database crunching. Frankly, I don't do any of that kind of thing and the most compute intensive things I use (probably the HRTF functions in Direct X) do not, at least in my applications, bog down arelatively old 32 bit single core XP laptop and don't even come close to abottleneck on my year and a half old Vista machine. I must say that the 64bit OSX Leopard edition on Macintosh is really peppy but comparing that toWindows is not a fair way to judge as the software running is also vastly different.I find that for price/performance for a solid PC that will do everything Iwant it to the best prices are available at www.dell.com/outlet where you can get a lease return with full guarantee that will contain a really kicking processor, decent sized hd, as much memory as you will need or want for about $350 and a very adequate PC for around $150. If you want to take the plunge into Macintosh, for a little over $1000 you can get a kick ass laptop and run XP under VMWare with the screen reader of your choice in a separate Window. Other than web browsing related tasks where JAWS, WE, SA, etc. are all better) , I find that I can get almost everything I need to do done well on a Macintosh with VoiceOver quickly and with a level of stability I couldn't dream of on a PC with a screen reader (at one point, Ikept my Macintosh running non-stop for four weeks without a single need toreboot until I installed some new software).Ok, you asked for perspectives and I'm in a NyQuil haze after walking somedistance through Cambridge in a downpour yesterday so this is what you get... Happy Hacking, cdh Chris Hofstader CUNY, BSO, ATG, Odds and Ends email: cdh@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Blog: http://www.blindconfidential.blogspot.com Skype: BlindChristian phone: 727-896-6393 -----Original Message----- From: programmingblind-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:programmingblind-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Jamal Mazrui Sent: Thursday, October 02, 2008 9:01 AM To: programmingblind@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: Seeking perspectives on a computer purchasing predicament About 10 days ago, I purchased a new computer from a Best Buy store in Silver Spring, Maryland. My hope was to get good value on the computer and from the store's "Geek Squad" service that delivers and installs it, including a wireless network. I had not bought a new computer in severalyears and was not familiar with hardware differences in current offerings.I knew I wanted the home version of Windows Vista, and asked the senior technical representative on duty for a recommendation on a computer that used "industry-standard" components as much as possible, therebymaximizing compatibility with the screen reader technology that I used. Iemphasized memory and hard disk space over a graphics card and monitor intended for games. The representative indicated that he understood myneeds and recommended a Del computer with relatively large memory and harddisk specifications. Last Saturday, a Geek Squad technician delivered the computer to my home, installed it and the wireless network. At the end of the process, he mentioned that it was a 64-bit computer. I was shocked and dismayed as I knew that no screen reader worked with 64-bits yet. As evidence, I had him run a copy of JAWS, which immediately said it would not work on a 64-bit computer. The technician acknowledged that it had been a mistake to recommend such a computer, particularly in the context of my request for industry-standard components, and without even asking me if 64-bits was an acceptable specification. He said he would return on Wednesday with a replacement, 32-bit computer. It had not occured to me to specify 32-bits because I had perceived it, although changing over time, as still being a feature of high-end computers intended for a circumscribed set of resource-intensiveapplications, rather than for customers at a Best Buy store with a typical consumer interest in running a range of applications, including ones foundon the Internet.The technician was scheduled to arrive between noon and 4 PM on Wednesday,yesterday. I took a vacation day from work to be there, though I had not wanted to lose vacation time for this originally. Despite repeated calls I made during the day to confirm the appointment, the technician did not call me until about 4:30 from the Best Buy store, where he said he discovered no 32-bit computers available. He discussed the problem withothers there and said their recommendation was to load a 32-bit version of Vista on the 64-bit computer I purchased. Although they had little actualexperience with this, and were unable to contact a Del representative to confirm the approach, they were confident it would work except that only3.5 out of the 6 gigabytes of memory would be addressable because that wasan upper limit for 32-bit Windows. I asked but they were not willing to call other Best Buy stores in the greater DC area to check if they had a32-bit Del computer in stock. I said I would go along with this plan, nowscheduled for a Sunday installation at my home, but that I would have to do immediate testing of various programs to assure myself that there wereno compatibility problems. Since it is a few days away, I thought it bestto schedule the re-install and do some additional research in the meantime. With that background, I am seeking information and advice from list members on a few questions. Will there be no compatibility problems from loading 32-bit Vista and drivers on a 32-bit computer. Specifically, it is a Del Inspiron Model I530-110B. Is 3.5 gigabytes the maximum addressable memory in this case? Would the same limit be true on a 32-bit computer? I had also purchased Microsoft Office Professional 2007. They said that the same version runs on either 32-bit or 64-bit computers. Is that the case? Does anyone have more experience to share about Best Buy and Geek Squad? The representatives involved say that they usually sell 64-bit computers now. I find this surprising since I thought a majority of software stillrequires 32-bits today. Is their statement credible? Is this the defaultretail practice now? Jamal __________ View the list's information and change your settings at //www.freelists.org/list/programmingblind __________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature database 3486 (20081001) __________ The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus. http://www.eset.com __________ View the list's information and change your settings at //www.freelists.org/list/programmingblind__________ View the list's information and change your settings at //www.freelists.org/list/programmingblind__________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signaturedatabase 3490 (20081002) __________ The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus. http://www.eset.com __________ View the list's information and change your settings at //www.freelists.org/list/programmingblind
__________View the list's information and change your settings at //www.freelists.org/list/programmingblind