[procps] Re: Incorrect FSF address in the license files
- From: Sami Kerola <kerolasa@xxxxxx>
- To: procps@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Fri, 2 Mar 2012 13:38:14 +0100
On Thu, Mar 1, 2012 at 22:56, Craig Small <csmall-procps@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 01, 2012 at 11:39:39AM -0500, Jaromir Capik wrote:
>> I'm sorry to tell you that procps-ng did NOT pass
>> the Fedora review process. It's because of licensing issues
>> I didn't notice when I was checking the headers.
> This is nothing new. That bit of the files has been like that
> for ever.
>
> sysctl and pgrep are GPL 2+
> The rest is LGPL 2.1+
>
>> Guys, could you please quickly look inside and tell me
>> if it is possible to convert these files to one of
>> the licenses contained in the COPYING / COPYING.LIB
>> by altering the file header?
> That should not be too hard, it would basically make explicit what
> everything is licensed under anyhow.
Do you mean something like
https://gitorious.org/~kerolasa/procps/sami-procps-ng/commit/240ef79448b4926255fb9878b308d6a8355414b3
--
Sami Kerola
http://www.iki.fi/kerolasa/
Other related posts:
