[procps] Re: Incorrect FSF address in the license files
- From: Jim Warner <james.warner@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: procps@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Wed, 22 Feb 2012 10:40:48 -0600
On Feb 22, 2012, at 9:39 AM, Jaromir Capik wrote:
> Hello guys.
>
> I'm just trying to introduce procps-ng
> in the latest Fedora, but I got the
> following errors while doing a sanity
> check (needed to pass the review):
>
> -------------
> procps-ng.i686: W: shared-lib-calls-exit /lib/libprocps.so.0.0.0
> _exit@xxxxxxxxx
> procps-ng.i686: W: shared-lib-calls-exit /lib/libprocps.so.0.0.0
> exit@xxxxxxxxx
> procps-ng.i686: E: incorrect-fsf-address
> /usr/share/doc/procps-ng-3.3.2/COPYING
> procps-ng.i686: W: manual-page-warning /usr/share/man/man1/top.1.gz 131:
> warning: macro `Bd' not defined
> procps-ng.i686: W: manual-page-warning /usr/share/man/man1/top.1.gz 162:
> warning: macro `Ed' not defined
> procps-ng.i686: E: incorrect-fsf-address
> /usr/share/doc/procps-ng-3.3.2/COPYING.LIB
> procps-ng.i686: W: manual-page-warning /usr/share/man/man1/ps.1.gz 1876: `\:'
> is not allowed in a name
> procps-ng.i686: W: manual-page-warning /usr/share/man/man1/ps.1.gz 1876:
> warning: macro `URalbert@' not defined (possibly missing space after `UR')
> -------------
Hi Stranger,
As for the library warnings, could you chalk it up to "in transition"? We plan
to eventually try and make a real library out of libprocps.
For the top.1 warnings, the .Bd and .Ed macros are from the standard groff_mdoc
collection. Are the warnings perhaps bogus?
I'll let Sami comment on the ps.1 warnings.
Regards,
Jim
Other related posts:
