[procps] Re: C-States handling - new switch?

On Feb 9, 2012, at 10:43 AM, Jaromir Capik wrote:
I very sorry Jim.
> 
> After some tests here I believe that we have no chance
> to implement such feature.
> I built my request on a wrong presumption, that it's 
> the total sum, that changes with the dynamic frequency scaling.
> But that's not true. In fact it's the user counter that changes,
> because the particular values represent time units depleted by
> the processes and in such case we have absolutely no chance
> to make it frequency independent.
> Even if the issue is present, we can't solve it.
> That's frustrating.
> 
> Sorry for stealing Your time ...

Cheer up, Jaromir!

You still gave us the Nehalem approach.

That's a worthwhile improvement, isn't it?.

Regards,
Jim
 


Other related posts: