[procps] Re: C-States handling - new switch?
- From: Jaromir Capik <jcapik@xxxxxxxxxx>
- To: procps@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Thu, 09 Feb 2012 11:43:31 -0500 (EST)
I very sorry Jim. After some tests here I believe that we have no chance to implement such feature. I built my request on a wrong presumption, that it's the total sum, that changes with the dynamic frequency scaling. But that's not true. In fact it's the user counter that changes, because the particular values represent time units depleted by the processes and in such case we have absolutely no chance to make it frequency independent. Even if the issue is present, we can't solve it. That's frustrating. Sorry for stealing Your time ... Jaromir.
- Follow-Ups:
- [procps] Re: C-States handling - new switch?
- From: Jim Warner
- [procps] Re: C-States handling - new switch?
- References:
- [procps] Re: C-States handling - new switch?
- From: Jaromir Capik
- [procps] Re: C-States handling - new switch?
Other related posts:
- » [procps] C-States handling - new switch? - Jaromir Capik
- » [procps] Re: C-States handling - new switch? - Jim Warner
- » [procps] Re: C-States handling - new switch? - Jim Warner
- » [procps] Re: C-States handling - new switch? - Jaromir Capik
- » [procps] Re: C-States handling - new switch? - Jaromir Capik
- » [procps] Re: C-States handling - new switch? - Jaromir Capik
- » [procps] Re: C-States handling - new switch? - Craig Small
- » [procps] Re: C-States handling - new switch? - Jaromir Capik
- » [procps] Re: C-States handling - new switch? - Jim Warner
- » [procps] Re: C-States handling - new switch? - Jaromir Capik
- » [procps] Re: C-States handling - new switch? - Jim Warner
- » [procps] Re: C-States handling - new switch? - Jim Warner
- » [procps] Re: C-States handling - new switch? - Jaromir Capik
- » [procps] Re: C-States handling - new switch? - Jim Warner
- » [procps] Re: C-States handling - new switch? - Jaromir Capik
- » [procps] Re: C-States handling - new switch? - Jaromir Capik
- » [procps] Re: C-States handling - new switch? - Jim Warner
- » [procps] Re: C-States handling - new switch? - Jaromir Capik
- » [procps] Re: C-States handling - new switch? - Jim Warner
- » [procps] Re: C-States handling - new switch? - Jaromir Capik
- » [procps] Re: C-States handling - new switch? - Jim Warner
- » [procps] Re: C-States handling - new switch? - Jaromir Capik
- » [procps] Re: C-States handling - new switch? - Jim Warner
- » [procps] Re: C-States handling - new switch? - Craig Small
- » [procps] Re: C-States handling - new switch? - Jim Warner
- » [procps] Re: C-States handling - new switch? - Jim Warner
- » [procps] Re: C-States handling - new switch? - Craig Small
- » [procps] Re: C-States handling - new switch? - Jaromir Capik
- » [procps] Re: C-States handling - new switch? - Jim Warner
- » [procps] Re: C-States handling - new switch? - Jaromir Capik
- » [procps] Re: C-States handling - new switch? - Jaromir Capik
- » [procps] Re: C-States handling - new switch? - Jim Warner
- » [procps] Re: C-States handling - new switch? - Jaromir Capik
- » [procps] Re: C-States handling - new switch? - Jim Warner
- » [procps] Re: C-States handling - new switch? - Jaromir Capik
- » [procps] Re: C-States handling - new switch? - Jim Warner
- » [procps] Re: C-States handling - new switch? - Jaromir Capik
- » [procps] Re: C-States handling - new switch? - Jim Warner
- » [procps] Re: C-States handling - new switch? - Jaromir Capik
- » [procps] Re: C-States handling - new switch? - Jim Warner
- » [procps] Re: C-States handling - new switch? - Jaromir Capik
- » [procps] Re: C-States handling - new switch? - Jim Warner
- » [procps] Re: C-States handling - new switch? - Jaromir Capik
- » [procps] Re: C-States handling - new switch? - Jaromir Capik
- » [procps] Re: C-States handling - new switch? - Jaromir Capik
- » [procps] Re: C-States handling - new switch? - Jim Warner
- » [procps] Re: C-States handling - new switch? - Jaromir Capik
- » [procps] Re: C-States handling - new switch? - Craig Small
- » [procps] Re: C-States handling - new switch? - Jim Warner
- » [procps] Re: C-States handling - new switch? - Jaromir Capik
- » [procps] Re: C-States handling - new switch? - Jaromir Capik