[procps] Re: C-States handling - new switch?
- From: Jim Warner <james.warner@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: procps@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Tue, 7 Feb 2012 12:18:44 -0600
On Feb 7, 2012, at 12:05 PM, Jaromir Capik wrote: >> Yep, just one cycle. >> > > The following real data collected on 3.2.8 looks for me like periodic > switching on and off ... (several times per second). > > # top -d 0.25 | grep "Cpu2 " > Cpu2 : 0.0%us, 0.0%sy, 0.0%ni,100.0%id, 0.0%wa, 0.0%hi, 0.0%si, 0.0%st > Cpu2 : 0.0%us, 0.0%sy, 0.0%ni, 0.0%id, 0.0%wa, 0.0%hi, 0.0%si, 0.0%st > ... > And now imagine a case where some process produces very short > periodic 'user' peaks followed by absolute idle state. > In that case such malicious state (where only user ticks are registered) > could appear quite frequently. Am I wrong? Hi Jaromir, Somehow you got ahead of me on freelists. I've got one email in the pipeline that hasn't been echoed yet. Anyway, before speculating on what old top might do or if your scenario is even possible, can you please tell me the delay interval that produced those results. Thanks, Jim
- Follow-Ups:
- [procps] Re: C-States handling - new switch?
- From: Jaromir Capik
- [procps] Re: C-States handling - new switch?
- References:
- [procps] Re: C-States handling - new switch?
- From: Jaromir Capik
- [procps] Re: C-States handling - new switch?
Other related posts:
- » [procps] C-States handling - new switch? - Jaromir Capik
- » [procps] Re: C-States handling - new switch? - Jim Warner
- » [procps] Re: C-States handling - new switch? - Jim Warner
- » [procps] Re: C-States handling - new switch? - Jaromir Capik
- » [procps] Re: C-States handling - new switch? - Jaromir Capik
- » [procps] Re: C-States handling - new switch? - Jaromir Capik
- » [procps] Re: C-States handling - new switch? - Craig Small
- » [procps] Re: C-States handling - new switch? - Jaromir Capik
- » [procps] Re: C-States handling - new switch? - Jim Warner
- » [procps] Re: C-States handling - new switch? - Jaromir Capik
- » [procps] Re: C-States handling - new switch? - Jim Warner
- » [procps] Re: C-States handling - new switch? - Jim Warner
- » [procps] Re: C-States handling - new switch? - Jaromir Capik
- » [procps] Re: C-States handling - new switch? - Jim Warner
- » [procps] Re: C-States handling - new switch? - Jaromir Capik
- » [procps] Re: C-States handling - new switch? - Jaromir Capik
- » [procps] Re: C-States handling - new switch? - Jim Warner
- » [procps] Re: C-States handling - new switch? - Jaromir Capik
- » [procps] Re: C-States handling - new switch? - Jim Warner
- » [procps] Re: C-States handling - new switch? - Jaromir Capik
- » [procps] Re: C-States handling - new switch? - Jim Warner
- » [procps] Re: C-States handling - new switch? - Jaromir Capik
- » [procps] Re: C-States handling - new switch? - Jim Warner
- » [procps] Re: C-States handling - new switch? - Craig Small
- » [procps] Re: C-States handling - new switch? - Jim Warner
- » [procps] Re: C-States handling - new switch? - Jim Warner
- » [procps] Re: C-States handling - new switch? - Craig Small
- » [procps] Re: C-States handling - new switch? - Jaromir Capik
- » [procps] Re: C-States handling - new switch? - Jim Warner
- » [procps] Re: C-States handling - new switch? - Jaromir Capik
- » [procps] Re: C-States handling - new switch? - Jaromir Capik
- » [procps] Re: C-States handling - new switch? - Jim Warner
- » [procps] Re: C-States handling - new switch? - Jaromir Capik
- » [procps] Re: C-States handling - new switch? - Jim Warner
- » [procps] Re: C-States handling - new switch? - Jaromir Capik
- » [procps] Re: C-States handling - new switch? - Jim Warner
- » [procps] Re: C-States handling - new switch? - Jaromir Capik
- » [procps] Re: C-States handling - new switch? - Jim Warner
- » [procps] Re: C-States handling - new switch? - Jaromir Capik
- » [procps] Re: C-States handling - new switch? - Jim Warner
- » [procps] Re: C-States handling - new switch? - Jaromir Capik
- » [procps] Re: C-States handling - new switch? - Jim Warner
- » [procps] Re: C-States handling - new switch? - Jaromir Capik
- » [procps] Re: C-States handling - new switch? - Jaromir Capik
- » [procps] Re: C-States handling - new switch? - Jaromir Capik
- » [procps] Re: C-States handling - new switch? - Jim Warner
- » [procps] Re: C-States handling - new switch? - Jaromir Capik
- » [procps] Re: C-States handling - new switch? - Craig Small
- » [procps] Re: C-States handling - new switch? - Jim Warner
- » [procps] Re: C-States handling - new switch? - Jaromir Capik
- » [procps] Re: C-States handling - new switch? - Jaromir Capik