Re: [PCWorks] Vista with SP1
- From: "Clint Hamilton-PCWorks Admin" <PCWorks@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <pcworks@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 6 Jul 2008 06:40:31 -0500
Like I said, it depends on what one does with their PC. ;-)
When I click the "Analyze" button it says "This volume is
heavily fragmented" (usually after about 2-3 weeks). If it
says "slightly fragmented" I don't do it, and I don't always do
it if it says "moderately fragmented". This is on my D:
partition, which is where I moved the folders I mentioned. (I
just now checked and C: is "moderately fragmented" and D: is
"heavily fragmented"). I don't use the default XP Native
Diskeeper program, I use another version of it, Diskeeper Lite,
that's a bit more thorough.
Yeah I saw that Vista is a bit different with handling
fragmentation.
-Clint
God Bless
Clint Hamilton, Owner
http://www.OrpheusComputing.com
http://www.ComputersCustomBuilt.com
----- Original Message -----
From: "Hugh Vandervoort"
I've probably been hanging with the wrong crowd, but I don't
think
defrag is particularly important in XP with NTFS. Even the
worst cases
I've ever seen (No defrag for years) benefited very little from
defrag,
performance wise.
I check every few months, and follow the "analyse"
recommendations.
I haven't checked the Vista defrag in a while, but I believe
there's
been some changes and it's an automated background process.
Clint Hamilton-PCWorks Admin wrote:
> ".....defragging is unnecessary for the most part". ??
>
> Do you mean just on Vista? I can't speak for it, but it is
> necessary for XP. Not doing so regularly can slow it down.
> The sequential reading/writing of data on a heavily
> fragmented
> HD is slowed down because the time needed for the disk heads
> to
> move between fragments and waiting for the disk platter to
> rotate into position is increased (increased seek time which
> is
> cumulative, and rotational delay). Defrag'ing can increase
> the
> life span of the HD, by minimizing the movement of the
> head(s).
> Of course this depends on the type of computing one does. If
> one rarely uses their PC, doesn't do much website wise and
> doesn't get many emails, defrag'ing would be rarely needed.
> But if one goes to dozens of websites a day, gets hundreds of
> emails, or does any kind of large audio or video compilation
> and editing, it's needed regularly. This is why I put OE's
> storage and the Temp Net files folder on a separate
> partition,
> along with video editing folders. C: doesn't need much
> defrag'ing, but that other partition needs it A LOT.
> -Clint
=========================
The list's FAQ's can be seen by sending an email to
PCWorks-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with FAQ in the subject line.
To unsubscribe, subscribe, set Digest or Vacation to on or off, go to
//www.freelists.org/list/pcworks . You can also send an email to
PCWorks-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with Unsubscribe in the subject line. Your
member list settings can be found at
//www.freelists.org/cgi-bin/lsg2.cgi/l=pcworks . Once logged in, you have
access to numerous other email options.
The list archives are located at //www.freelists.org/archives/pcworks/ .
All email posted to the list will be placed there in the event anyone needs to
look for previous posts.
Other related posts:
