[patriots] Fw: Home Office reply
- From: Dianne Carr <patriotsplace1103@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: Dianne <patriots@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 19 Sep 2014 20:10:32 +0100
Please could you have a look at this. I do not think this woman should be
incharge of the Rotherham child abuse investigation. What do you think? And
should we start a petion up against her. Di
----- Forwarded Message -----
From: "anne upton
To: steve@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Monday, 15 September 2014, 20:27
Subject: Re: Home Office reply
Dear STEVE WEBB MP
Thank you for your reply.
Please can you explain why I should have any confidence in the
appointment as chairman for the Panel of an enquiry into child sex
abuse someone who is an Honourary Member of the Middle Temple?
It is my understanding that as a BAR attorney at law, she took an
ominous oath to the International BAR Association, which grants
attorneys and lawyers one of the most odious European titles of
nobility in history – that of being an esquire but this is not an oath
to the people of these islands.
If Ms Woolf does take an oath to the people, which oath would prevail
please?
It is my understanding that the BAR Association is similar to a law
society, but is in actuality a tax-exempt trade union which advocates
for its members – which are accepted Members called BAR attorneys.
Disbarment is similar to admonishment, for the reputation of the BAR is
at stake, and public disgrace will of course not be tolerated… only
private disgrace without media and public scrutiny.
Please can you explain to me how Fiona Woolf, though doubtless very
well qualified in matters of law, will be able to sit in unbiased
opinion when the individual being questioned is a fellow BAR member and
the reputation of the BAR is at stake?
I would be grateful if you would correct me if any of my above
understandings are incorrect.
I would also like to add that "experts" from Rotherham Council, Police
Authority etc. were in charge of the 1400 cases (including 100 babies)
of child abuse/trafficking that carried on over a sixteen year period
and were covered up/ignored/dismissed, so again I have no confidence in
"he confirms that the panel will be made up of experts" I would go so
far as to suggest that these "experts" are the very last people we need
for, as recent events confirm, so-called "experts" have let us down
very badly.
We want, nay demand/require, that this PUBLIC enquiry is made up
primarily of members of that PUBLIC - it is the only way we will accept
the Panel's integrity.
Yours truly
anne upton.
To: anneabba <anneabba@xxxxxxx>
Sent: Mon, 15 Sep 2014 13:52
Subject: Home Office reply
Dear Anne Upton,
I have now received the attached reply from the Home Office in response
to the concerns I raised on your behalf, about the panel that is being
set up to investigate historic child abuse allegations.
As you will see, the Minister states that, at the time of writing, the
Government was still seeking a chairman for the panel. You will
probably know that Fiona Woolf, the current Lord Mayor of London, has
now been appointed to this role.
The Minister sets out the broad remit for the panel to investigate, the
areas to which it will have access, and when it will make its initial
progress report.
He confirms that the panel will be made up of experts and they will
look into non-state bodies as well as public institutions. He also
explains that it will be set up as an inquiry panel so that it does not
jeopardise the ongoing criminal investigations.
I hope that this is helpful, but if you would like me to press the
Minister further on any of his points, or if there is anything more
that I can pursue on this matter on your behalf, please do not hesitate
to let me know.
Yours sincerely,
Steve Webb MP
Other related posts:
