Re: sync up production to UAT for a 500G+ database
- From: "dbvision@xxxxxxxxxxxx" <dbvision@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: ORACLE-L <oracle-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 17 Mar 2008 23:51:52 +0900
And where was it said
or implied it wasn't licensed?
What it doesn't have to be is a
full-on EE, CPU-based licence.
On Mon Mar 17 20:03 , "Bradd Piontek" sent:
>Am I missing something? Whether you are using dataguard or not, you need to
license the test database.
>
>
>On Mon, Mar 17, 2008 at 3:55 AM, LS Cheng <exriscer@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>I am not sure how Mirrorview license works but with DG you pay per instance per
CPU so it gets damn expensive.....
>
>
>--
>LSC
>
--
http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: sync up production to UAT for a 500G+ database
- From: Mark Brinsmead
Other related posts:
- » sync up production to UAT for a 500G+ database
- » RE: sync up production to UAT for a 500G+ database
- » Re: sync up production to UAT for a 500G+ database
- » Re: sync up production to UAT for a 500G+ database
- » RE: sync up production to UAT for a 500G+ database
- » Re: sync up production to UAT for a 500G+ database
- » Re: sync up production to UAT for a 500G+ database
- » Re: sync up production to UAT for a 500G+ database
- » Re: sync up production to UAT for a 500G+ database
- » Re: sync up production to UAT for a 500G+ database
- » Re: sync up production to UAT for a 500G+ database
- » Re: sync up production to UAT for a 500G+ database
- » RE: sync up production to UAT for a 500G+ database
- » Re: sync up production to UAT for a 500G+ database
- » Re: sync up production to UAT for a 500G+ database
- » RE: sync up production to UAT for a 500G+ database
- » Re: sync up production to UAT for a 500G+ database
- Re: sync up production to UAT for a 500G+ database
- From: Mark Brinsmead